see attached
Written assignment:
1.
Personal Experience Professional Assignment
In a 3- to 4-page, APA-formatted paper, describe a time that you or one of your organization’s leaders implemented a plan, system, or process that failed.
1. Describe whether there was reluctance to end the failed plan, system, or process.
2. What finally caused the organization to move towards using a new approach?
3. If the organization is still operating the failed program, what effect is this having on internal stakeholders?
4. What decision would you have made if you were given the opportunity to do it all over again?
5. How does that decision differ from what was implemented and failed previously?
2.
Bad Decision Making Case Analysis Assignment
For your final paper, write a 5-6-page, APA-formatted case history of a decision-making disaster that impacted any country, state, or city greatly. Investigate the decision made by the organization and write-up a case history of the decision, including the decision making process, and the outcome.
At this point, you should have received a comprehensive education of the strategies, challenges, and opportunities within the topic of managerial and strategic decision-making. Be sure to incorporate all of this new understanding within your paper. Consider the information that you have learned in your readings and previous case analysis assignments.
Support your thoughts and ideas with your textbook plus a minimum of six (6) relevant, outside, academic, or peer-reviewed sources that are properly identified, cited, and referenced.
No AI allowed; turn-it-in similarity must be under 15%
Rubric:
Criteria | Performance Indicators (Observation descriptors indicating extent to which criterion is met.) | ||||
Exemplary 10・9 | Proficient 8・7・6 | Needs Improvement 5・4 | Unsatisfactory 3・2・1 | No Submission | |
Depth 30% of overall grade | Content indicates synthesis of ideas, in depth analysis, and evidence of original thought and support for the topic. | Content indicates original thinking and develops ideas with sufficient and firm evidence. | Content indicates thinking and reasoning applied with original thought on a few ideas. | Content indicates some thinking and reasoning but most ideas are unoriginal or underdeveloped. | 0 points |
Resources 25% of overall grade | All evidence supports arguments and is relevant to the topic. The student uses the required number and type of resources identified in the syllabus to support his/her argument. | Most evidence supports arguments and is relevant to the topic. The student uses 75% of the required number and type of resources identified in the syllabus to support his/her argument. | Some evidence supports arguments and is relevant to the topic. The student uses 50% of the required number of sources. | Limited evidence to support arguments, with few sources relevant to the topic. The student uses less than 50% of the required number of sources. | 0 points |
Organization 15% of overall grade | Paper has a high degree of attention to logic and reasoning of points. Paper clearly leads the reader to the conclusion and stirs thought regarding the topic. | Paper is coherent and logically organized with transitions used between ideas and paragraphs to create coherence. Overall unity of ideas is present. | Paper is somewhat structured and logically organized. Some points remain misplaced and stray from the topic. Transitions evident but not used throughout. | Paper is limited in logical organization with major errors. | 0 points |
Mechanics 15% of overall grade | Few errors in spelling, punctuation, capitalization, sentence structure, and grammar. | Occasional errors in spelling, punctuation, capitalization, sentence structure and grammar, but meaning is not obscured. | Frequent errors of spelling, punctuation, capitalization, sentence structure and grammar; meaning confused or obscured. | Dominated by errors in spelling, punctuation, capitalization, sentence structure and grammar; meaning at times unidentifiable. | 0 points |
Formatting 15% of overall grade | Paper meets all formatting guidelines and assignment requirements, including page-length and APA formatting requirements. Paper is correctly assembled with a professional look. | The paper follows most formatting guidelines, including page-length and APA formatting requirements.Paper is correctly assembled. | Paper generally follows formatting guidelines and assignment requirements, including page-length and APA formatting requirements. Paper has some assembly errors | Paper does not follow formatting guidelines and assignment requirements, including page -length and APA format requirements. Paper has major assembly errors | 0 points |
