ACADEMIC SUCCESS AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN PART 3: RESEARCH ANALYSIS Architect Daniel Libeskind is credited with saying “To provide

ACADEMIC SUCCESS AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN PART 3: RESEARCH ANALYSIS

Architect Daniel Libeskind is credited with saying “To provide meaningful architecture is not to parody history, but to articulate it.” The suggestion is that his work does not copy the efforts of others but relies on it.

Understanding the work of others is critically important to new work. Contributions to the nursing body of knowledge can happen when you are able to analyze and articulate the efforts of previous research. Research analysis skills are therefore critical tools for your toolbox.

In this Assignment, you will locate relevant existing research. You also will analyze this research using a tool helpful for analysis.

RESOURCES

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources. 



WEEKLY RESOURCES

To Prepare:

· Reflect on the strategies presented in the Resources this Module’s Learning Resources in support of locating and analyzing research.

· Use the Walden Library to identify and read one peer-reviewed research article focused on a topic in your specialty field that interests you.

· Review the article you selected and reflect on the professional practice use of theories/concepts described by the article.

The Assignment:

Using the “Module 3 | Part 3” section of your 
Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template presented in the Resources, conduct an analysis of the elements of the research article you identified. Be sure to include the following:

· Your topic of interest.

· A correctly formatted APA citation of the article you selected, along with link or search details.

· Identify a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.

· Analysis of the article using the “Research Analysis Matrix” section of the template

· Write a 1-paragraph justification stating whether you would recommend this article to inform professional practice.

· Write a 2- to 3-paragraph summary that you will add to your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan that includes the following:

· Describe your approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research.

· Identify at least two strategies that you would use that you found to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research.

· Identify at least one resource you intend to use in the future to find peer-reviewed research.


Note:

 Add your work for this Assignment to the original document you began in the Module 1 Assignment, which was built from the Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template.

BY DAY 7 OF WEEK 5

Submit your analysis, including your completed section of the 
Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template sections and your matrix and summary.

SUBMISSION INFORMATION

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the 
Turnitin Drafts from the 
Start Here area. 

1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as 
MD3Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial

2. Then, click on 
Start Assignment near the top of the page.

3. Next, click on 
Upload File and select 
Submit Assignment for review.

Rubric

NURS_6003_Module03_Week05_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_6003_Module03_Week05_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUsing the Week 3 Part 3, section of your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template complete Step 1. Conduct an analysis of the elements of the research article you identified. Be sure to include the following:· The topic of interest you have selected. · Correctly formatted APA citation of the article you selected, along with link or search details. · Identify one or more professional practice uses of the theories/concepts presented in the article.

25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent

The response clearly identifies the topic of interest selected. … The response accurately and completely provides a citation of the article selected, including an accurate and complete link or thorough search details. … The response clearly identifies and describes in detail a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good

The response partially identifies the topic of interest selected. … The response provides a partial citation of the article selected, including a partial link or search details. … The response partially identifies and describes a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair

The response vaguely identifies the topic of interest selected. … The response vaguely or inaccurately provides a citation of the article selected, including vague or inaccurate search details. … The response vaguely or inaccurately identifies and describes a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.

17 to >0 pts

Poor

The response vaguely and inaccurately identifies the topic of interest selected or is missing. … The response vaguely and inaccurately provides a citation of the article selected, including vague and inaccurate search details, or is missing. … The response vaguely and inaccurately identifies and describes a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article or is missing.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template for:Strengths of the ResearchLimitations of the ResearchRelevancy to the Topic of Interest. · Write a one-paragraph justification explaining whether or not you would recommend the use of this article to inform professional practice.

20 to >17.0 pts

Excellent

The response clearly and accurately provides a detailed analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template. … The response clearly and accurately explains in detail the justification of whether to recommend the use of the article to inform professional practice.

17 to >15.0 pts

Good

The response provides a partial analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template. … The response partially explains the justification of whether or not to recommend the use of the article to inform professional practice.

15 to >13.0 pts

Fair

The response provides a vague or inaccurate analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template. … The response vaguely or inaccurately explains the justification of whether or not to recommend the use of the article to inform professional practice.

13 to >0 pts

Poor

The response provides a vague and inaccurate analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template or is missing. … The response vaguely and inaccurately explains the justification of whether or not to recommend the use of the article to inform professional practice or is missing.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 3, Step 2: Write a 2-3 paragraph summary that you will add to your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan that includes the following: · Describe your approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research· Identify at least two strategies that you would use that you found to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research. · Identify at least one resource you intend to use in the future to find peer-reviewed research.

45 to >40.0 pts

Excellent

The response clearly and accurately describes in detail the approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research. The response clearly identifies and accurately describes in detail at least two strategies used to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research. … The response clearly identifies and accurately describes in detail at least one resource you intend to use in the future to find peer-reviewed research.

40 to >35.0 pts

Good

The response partially describes the approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research. The response partially identifies and describes at least two strategies used to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research. … The response partially identifies and describes in detail at least one resource you intend to use in the future to find peer-reviewed research.

35 to >31.0 pts

Fair

The response vaguely or inaccurately describes the approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research. The response vaguely or inaccurately identifies and describes at least two strategies used to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research. … The response vaguely or inaccurately identifies describes in detail at least one resource you intend to use in the future to find peer-reviewed research.

31 to >0 pts

Poor

The response vaguely and inaccurately describes the approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research or is missing. The response vaguely and inaccurately identifies and describes at least two strategies used to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research or is missing. … The response vaguely or inaccurately identifies describes in detail or is missing at least one resource you intend to use in the future to find peer-reviewed research.

45 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. which delineates all required criteria.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts

Total Points: 100


Previous


Next

LEARNING RESOURCES


Required Readings

· Al-Jundi, A., & Sakka, S. (2017).

Critical appraisal of clinical researchLinks to an external site.
.
 Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research: JCDR, 11(5), JE01–JE05.

· Shellenbarger, T. (2016). 

Simplifying synthesisLinks to an external site.

Nurse Author & Editor, 26(3). Retrieved from

· Walden University Library. (n.d.). 

Databases A-Z: NursingLinks to an external site.
. Retrieved October 4, 2019 from

· Walden University Library. (n.d.). 

Evaluating resources: JournalsLinks to an external site.
. Retrieved October 4, 2019, from

· Walden University Library. (n.d.). 

Instructional media: Fundamentals of library researchLinks to an external site.
. Retrieved October 4, 2019 from

·

Walden University Writing Center.Links to an external site.
 (n.d.). Retrieved November 14, 2018, from

· Walden University Writing Center. (n.d.). 

Common assignments: Synthesizing your sourcesLinks to an external site.
.

· Walden University Writing Center. (n.d.). 

Scholarly writing: OverviewLinks to an external site.
. Retrieved November 14, 2018, from

· Walden University Writing Center. (n.d.). 

Webinars: Technical informationLinks to an external site.
. Retrieved November 14, 2018, from

·
Document: 

Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template


 Download Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template
(Word document)

·
Document: 

Introduction to Scholarly Writing: Tips for success


 Download Introduction to Scholarly Writing: Tips for success
(PDF)


Required Media

 


Previous


Next

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Preparing the Assignment State: *Florida* 1. The  State Specific Guidelines for

Preparing the Assignment State: *Florida* 1. The  State Specific Guidelines for Prescribing Controlled Substances & Medical Devices assignment is worth 125 points and will be graded on the quality of required components as summarized in the directions and grading criteria/rubric. 2. Follow the directions and the grading criteria located in the

 Every day, people make choices that affect their physical health and wellness. Some choices are influenced by the environment and social factors, which

 Every day, people make choices that affect their physical health and wellness. Some choices are influenced by the environment and social factors, which in turn contribute to people’s health outcomes. Healthcare professionals (i.e., physicians, nurses, dietitians, sports medicine, etc.) are responsible for their own health by making decisions and practicing

find attached documentModule 05 Assignment – Designing a Care Map Course Competency · Explain components of multidimensional

find attached document Module 05 Assignment – Designing a Care Map Course Competency · Explain components of multidimensional nursing care for clients with musculoskeletal disorders. · Select appropriate nursing interventions when providing multidimensional care to clients experiencing alterations in mobility. Instructions Review the medical conditions in the textbook, including osteoporosis,

INDIVIDUALIZED AGING PROJECTPART 1: PROJECTED AGE OF SELFSTUDENT

INDIVIDUALIZED AGING PROJECT PART 1: PROJECTED AGE OF SELF STUDENT NAME___________________________ SUBMIT TO INSTRUCTOR DURING FIRST DAY OF CLINICAL Projected Age of Student_ 1. Draw your aged self & the projected age? ________ 2. Draw environment you wish to have. 3. Describe roles you will have and note those you

please see attached1. Goal: Enhance Proficiency in Differential Diagnosis Skills a. Objective: By the end of the first quarter, I will engage in

please see attached 1. Goal: Enhance Proficiency in Differential Diagnosis Skills a. Objective: By the end of the first quarter, I will engage in bi-weekly supervision sessions with an experienced clinician to strengthen my ability to differentiate between pathophysiological and psychopathological conditions, achieving a 20% improvement in independent decision-making. b.

   THE VALUE OF NURSING INFORMATICS AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT FOR NURSING PRACTICETransforming Nursing-Spring THE VALUE OF

   THE VALUE OF NURSING INFORMATICS AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT FOR NURSING PRACTICE Transforming Nursing-Spring THE VALUE OF NURSING INFORMATICS AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT FOR NURSING PRACTICE Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses and respond to two of your colleagues by expanding upon their responses or sharing additional or alternative perspectives.  PEER #1 · Kimberly Riley TuesdayMay