Week 4 Research Proposal Project: Design (Sampling, Reliability, Validity)Design For this section of your research proposal

Week 4 Research Proposal Project: Design (Sampling, Reliability, Validity)

Design

For this section of your research proposal assignment, you will focus on the sampling, reliability, and validity of your research proposal. This section will include information on sampling, reliability, and validity.

The following components should be addressed in your paper this week:

Information on your sample

· Sampling basic information (age, gender, criteria, etc.)

· Sample size

· Explain why your sample is appropriate for your study

Reliability

· Explain how your data collection process is consistent and reliable

· Explain why your measurement tool is reliable

Validity

· Explain how you will ensure you have a valid sample

· Explain how you tested the validity of your measurement tool

APA formatting, references, and citations are required.

Your research project design should be included as part of your final submission for your research proposal project in week 7 and your research proposal presentation in week 8. Use the feedback you receive from your instructor on your design to modify and improve before submission of your final project in weeks 7 and 8.

Due Sunday, 11:59 p.m. (Pacific time)

Points Possible: 75

Rubric

NURS_540_DE – NURS540 Research Design Rubric

NURS_540_DE – NURS540 Research Design Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSample

22.5 to >18.45 pts

Accomplished

Sampling basic information (age gender, criteria, etc.), sample size and a clear explanation of why the sample is appropriate for the study is included.

18.45 to >16.88 pts

Emerging

Sampling basic information (age gender, criteria, etc.), sample size and an explanation of why the sample is appropriate for the study is partially included.

16.88 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Sampling basic information (age gender, criteria, etc.), sample size and an explanation of why the sample is appropriate for the study is absent or largely inappropriate.

22.5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReliability

22.5 to >18.45 pts

Accomplished

A clear and reasonable explanation of the data collection process is included. A reliable measurement tool is included.

18.45 to >16.88 pts

Emerging

A somewhat clear and reasonable explanation of the data collection process is included. A somewhat reliable measurement tool is included.

16.88 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

An explanation of the data collection process and a measurement tool is absent or largely inappropriate.

22.5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeValidity

22.5 to >18.45 pts

Accomplished

An explanation of how the measurement tool is tested for validity is included and appropriate. A clear explanation of sample validity is included.

18.45 to >16.88 pts

Emerging

An explanation of how the measurement tool is tested for validity is included and somewhat appropriate. An explanation of sample validity is included.

16.88 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

An explanation of how the measurement tool is tested for validity is absent or largely inappropriate. An explanation of sample validity is absent or severely inappropriate for the study.

22.5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA & Mechanics

7.5 to >6.15 pts

Accomplished

The assignment consistently follows current APA format and is free from errors in formatting, citation, and references. There are no grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. All sources are cited and referenced correctly.

6.15 to >5.63 pts

Emerging

The assignment consistently follows current APA format with only isolated and inconsistent mistakes and/or has a few grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Most sources are cited and referenced correctly.

5.63 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No attempt to follow APA format is indicated. Sources are not used and/or there is no reference page. Mechanical errors significantly interfere with the readability of the paper.

7.5 pts

Total Points: 75


Previous


Next

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Preparing the Assignment State: *Florida* 1. The  State Specific Guidelines for

Preparing the Assignment State: *Florida* 1. The  State Specific Guidelines for Prescribing Controlled Substances & Medical Devices assignment is worth 125 points and will be graded on the quality of required components as summarized in the directions and grading criteria/rubric. 2. Follow the directions and the grading criteria located in the

 Every day, people make choices that affect their physical health and wellness. Some choices are influenced by the environment and social factors, which

 Every day, people make choices that affect their physical health and wellness. Some choices are influenced by the environment and social factors, which in turn contribute to people’s health outcomes. Healthcare professionals (i.e., physicians, nurses, dietitians, sports medicine, etc.) are responsible for their own health by making decisions and practicing

find attached documentModule 05 Assignment – Designing a Care Map Course Competency · Explain components of multidimensional

find attached document Module 05 Assignment – Designing a Care Map Course Competency · Explain components of multidimensional nursing care for clients with musculoskeletal disorders. · Select appropriate nursing interventions when providing multidimensional care to clients experiencing alterations in mobility. Instructions Review the medical conditions in the textbook, including osteoporosis,

INDIVIDUALIZED AGING PROJECTPART 1: PROJECTED AGE OF SELFSTUDENT

INDIVIDUALIZED AGING PROJECT PART 1: PROJECTED AGE OF SELF STUDENT NAME___________________________ SUBMIT TO INSTRUCTOR DURING FIRST DAY OF CLINICAL Projected Age of Student_ 1. Draw your aged self & the projected age? ________ 2. Draw environment you wish to have. 3. Describe roles you will have and note those you

please see attached1. Goal: Enhance Proficiency in Differential Diagnosis Skills a. Objective: By the end of the first quarter, I will engage in

please see attached 1. Goal: Enhance Proficiency in Differential Diagnosis Skills a. Objective: By the end of the first quarter, I will engage in bi-weekly supervision sessions with an experienced clinician to strengthen my ability to differentiate between pathophysiological and psychopathological conditions, achieving a 20% improvement in independent decision-making. b.

   THE VALUE OF NURSING INFORMATICS AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT FOR NURSING PRACTICETransforming Nursing-Spring THE VALUE OF

   THE VALUE OF NURSING INFORMATICS AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT FOR NURSING PRACTICE Transforming Nursing-Spring THE VALUE OF NURSING INFORMATICS AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT FOR NURSING PRACTICE Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses and respond to two of your colleagues by expanding upon their responses or sharing additional or alternative perspectives.  PEER #1 · Kimberly Riley TuesdayMay