While each paper focuses on a specific part of your manuscript, all papers have supporting materials to help you craft your paper. Each paper includes

While each paper focuses on a specific part of your manuscript, all papers have supporting materials to help you craft your paper. Each paper includes paper instructions (which are long and detailed but worth reading!), a grading rubric, a checklist, and two example papers from prior semesters. If you look over ALL FIVE items, your chances of getting a good grade will improve dramatically! 

  • 1). Paper III – Study Two Literature Review Instructions (Reactance Theory, Spring 2024)Actions
  • 2). Paper III – Study Two Literature Review Rubric Actions
  • 3). Paper III – Study Two Literature Review Checklist Actions
  • 4). Paper III Example Paper #1 – Counterfactual ThinkingActions
  • 5). Paper III Example Paper #2 – Facebook ApologiesActions

Additional Supporting Material for Paper III 

  • Paper Three – Overview PowerPoint Presentation Actions(Similar to the one presented by Dr. Winter in the “Paper Clinics”)
    • Example Paper referred to in the Overview Presentation Actions(Word Document)

RubricPaper III FINAL RubricPaper III FINAL RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTitle Page Criteria (1 point)1. Header (in ALL CAPS)

2. Page number

3. Descriptive Title (in bold)

4. Your Name

5. Your University

6. Perfect APA formatting1 ptsMeets all criteria0 ptsDoes not meet all criteria1 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLiterature Review Study One Criteria (3 points)1. Starts broad and narrows. 

2. Presents info clearly, educating the reader

3. Has smooth transitions between paragraphs

4. Includes 5 citations in APA format (minimum)

5. Concludes with study one predictions

6. Is 2 pages (minimum) excluding the predictions3 to >2.0 ptsMeets all criteria2 to >0.0 ptsMeets 3 to 4 criteria0 ptsMeets 0 to 2 criteria3 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMethods Study One Criteria (3 points)1. Presents participant data

2. Provides details about the materials (independent and dependent variables, consent, debriefing, etc.)

3. Provides details about the procedure (flow of info)

4. Uses correct APA format3 to >2.0 ptsMeets all criteria2 to >0.0 ptsMeets 2 to 3 criteria0 ptsMeets 0 to 1 criteria3 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResults Study One Criteria (3 points)1. Presents the results for three different analyses (one Chi Square, one ANOVA, one that is either a t-Test or an ANOVA)

2. Includes correct statistical numbers for each analysis

3. Includes correct APA formatting for each analysis3 to >2.0 ptsMeets all criteria2 to >0.0 ptsMeets only 2 criteria0 ptsMeets 0 to 1 criteria3 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscussion Study One Criteria (1 point)1. Reviews the hypothesis

2. Compares the findings to the hypotheses

3. Avoids statistical numbers1 ptsMeets all criteria0 ptsDoes not meet all criteria1 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLiterature Review Study Two (10 points)1. Starts broad and narrows. 

2. Presents info clearly, educating the reader about the new independent variable

3. Has smooth transitions between paragraphs

4. Includes enough citations in APA format to bring Paper III to 10 references (minimum)

5. Concludes with study two predictions (including a main effect prediction for your first IV, a main effect prediction for your second IV, and the interaction predictions for your first and second IVs

6. Is a minimum of 2 pages10 to >9.0 ptsMeets all criteria9 to >6.0 ptsAt least 5 criteria6 to >3.0 ptsMeets at least 4 criteria3 to >0.0 ptsMeets at least 3 criteria0 ptsMeets 0 to 2 criteria10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCitations Criteria (4 points)1. Provides citations for all factual claims

2. Provides citation in proper APA format

3. Uses proper APA format for quotes (if used) and does not overquote4 to >3.0 ptsMeets all criteria3 to >2.0 ptsMeets 3 criteria2 to >0.0 ptsMeets 2 criteria0 ptsMeets 0 to 1 criteria4 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReference Section Criteria (5 points)1. Includes 10 references (minimum)

2. References are listed alphabetically (by first author)

3. All references are in APA format (all but the first line indented, journal name in italics, title has mostly lower-case letters except the first word / proper nouns, authors first and middle names use initials, etc.)5 to >4.0 ptsMeets all criteria (No APA errors)4 to >3.0 ptsMeets 3 criteria (but with some APA errors)3 to >2.0 ptsMeets 2 criteria2 to >0.0 ptsMeets 1 criteria0 ptsMeets 0 criteria5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTables Criteria (1 point)1. Includes all four tables from study one: 

a. Demographics table (the descriptives table for age and frequency tables for gender and race)

b. Chi square table (with crosstab table and chi square table)

c. One ANOVA tables (with descriptives, ANOVA table, and post hoc table as needed)

d. One additional ANOVA table or one t-Test table (with descriptive table and t-Table)1 ptsMeets all criteria0 ptsDoes not meet all criteria1 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Quality Criteria (4 points)1. Uses proper spelling and punctuation

2. Has good transition between sentences

3. Includes good detail that informs the reader about important information in each paper section

4. Avoids plagiarism4 to >3.0 ptsMeets all criteria3 to >2.0 ptsMeets 3 criteria2 to >0.0 ptsMeets 2 criteria0 ptsMeets 0 to 1 criteria4 pts

Total Points: 35

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Write a 4 to 5-page essay. Topics: social norms individualism vs. collectivism social exchange how salience and accessibility influence information

Write a 4 to 5-page essay. Topics:  social norms individualism vs. collectivism social exchange how salience and accessibility influence information processing how cognitive heuristics influence social judgment cognitive reappraisal looking-glass self social comparison self-presentation the principle of attitude consistency sleeper effect cognitive dissonance impression formation attribution bias culture and conformity

Step 1: Select ONE of the following discussion prompts to write a well-organized essay (300-word minimum) with reference to the associated article. Be sure

Step 1: Select ONE of the following discussion prompts to write a well-organized essay (300-word minimum) with reference to the associated article. Be sure to use APA-style format, ensuring that quotes or paraphrases contain the page number in-text. What insights from anthropology do you think would be most useful to the public, environmental activists,

Write a 4-5-page paper in which you reflect on your personal gender identity. You will discuss factors that shaped this identity throughout your life as

Write a 4-5-page paper in which you reflect on your personal gender identity. You will discuss factors that shaped this identity throughout your life as well as your current feelings on your identity. You may choose to talk about your gender identity in conjunction with race/ethnicity, sex/gender, social class, religion, ability status or other