Using the information attached  c. Literature Review – Building off the research done for the annotated bibliography, review a very narrow area of

Using the information attached 

c. Literature Review – Building off the research done for the annotated bibliography, review a very narrow area of scholarly literature related to the interrogation topic. At least 5 scholarly sources are required. Include an introduction to the literature review section that (a) previews the material to come, (b) introduces key issues and/or defines key terms, and (c) restates the thesis. The body of the review should make points to support the thesis; these points should be supported with citations of scholarly sources. Organize the review by building logical arguments to support the thesis; do not simply summarize articles in no particular order. 

d. Application- This section integrates the literature review and the case history. Explain the specific insights that can be gained about this case from the literature review by applying the research in the review to the case. To provide just a sample of possible applications: if the research discussed misclassifications, explain how labeling an innocent person as guilty (based on their demeanor and the behavior they displayed) could affect the investigative interview; if the research discussed coercion, apply that concept to explain the case.  

e. Conclusion- The conclusion section should (a) summarize major points, (b) connect ideas from separate sections of the paper, and (c) provide a final message for readers. 

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

In the mini lecture, we discussed the policy implications of trait theories. Primarily, we looked at the implications for treatment, rehabilitation, and

In the mini lecture, we discussed the policy implications of trait theories. Primarily, we looked at the implications for treatment, rehabilitation, and prevention. Let’s expand this discussion to the criminal justice system. Specifically, the adjudication stage. Please address the following: Should individuals with Antisocial Personality Disorder be held responsible for

n this discussion, you’ll complete your first of three Walk In My Shoes assignments. These learning activities, which will end in your final presentation,

n this discussion, you’ll complete your first of three Walk In My Shoes assignments. These learning activities, which will end in your final presentation, explore corrections through the perspectives of individuals most impacted by these systems. We’ll begin by reading two articles from “Life Inside,” a weekly first-person series written by real

part A (2.3 Discussion: Police Organizations) Why This Discussion? Now that you’ve learned about police organizations, it’s time to apply what you’ve

part A (2.3 Discussion: Police Organizations) Why This Discussion? Now that you’ve learned about police organizations, it’s time to apply what you’ve learned while acting again as the chief of the Atlanta Police Department. Since police chiefs are expected to make evidence-based decisions as police leaders, consider what evidence from the

Description Deliverable Length: 2 pages (matrix may be enclosed in the paper) Complete the following:Using the technique of screening for suitability,

Description Deliverable Length: 2 pages (matrix may be enclosed in the paper) Complete the following: Using the technique of screening for suitability, feasibility, acceptability, distinguishability, completeness, and evaluation criteria, conduct a critical analysis to identify the most practical course of action (COA). Develop a comparison matrix slide that examines the COAs

Description Deliverable Length: 2 pages (matrix may be enclosed in the paper) Complete the following:Using the technique of screening for suitability,

Description Deliverable Length: 2 pages (matrix may be enclosed in the paper) Complete the following: Using the technique of screening for suitability, feasibility, acceptability, distinguishability, completeness, and evaluation criteria, conduct a critical analysis to identify the most practical course of action (COA). Develop a comparison matrix slide that examines the COAs