No AI  PLEASE SEND TURNITIN REPORT  Write a paper identifying techniques that could be done to disrupt the school-to-prison pipeline. Please include free

No AI 

PLEASE SEND TURNITIN REPORT 

Write a paper identifying techniques that could be done to disrupt the school-to-prison pipeline. Please include free or low-cost techniques, as well as more in-depth, systemic-level techniques that can lead to change. Please be creative and concise. More specifically, please address the following points in your paper:

Post must be complete sentences and thought out.  Please separate your answers per section.  Each section should be 150-250 words.  Make sure to cite or give credit if you are referencing someone else’s work. 

  1. Explain the school-to-prison pipeline and why we should be concerned with this topic (2 point)
  2. Describe at least two free or low-cost solutions/techniques. I am interested in things that could be done today to address this topic (3 points)
  3. Describe systemic influences that have “caused” or contributed to the school to prison pipeline. Describe techniques or solutions that would disrupt the pipeline, and specify how you propose to disrupt the pipeline (3 points)
  4. Peer Comment. Comment on 2 Peer Posts. (2 Points)

Additionally, please review the general grading rubric for assignments 1-8.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

SUBJECT: PSYCHOLOGY AND LAW   INSTRUCTIONS: Expert testimony and scientific evidence in general are held to certain standards before they can be ruled as

SUBJECT: PSYCHOLOGY AND LAW   INSTRUCTIONS: Expert testimony and scientific evidence in general are held to certain standards before they can be ruled as admissible. In many jurisdictions, the standards are referred to as the Daubert standards. One procedure that has had a checkered history regarding admissibility in court is polygraph testing, done

SUBJECT: PSYCHOLOGY AND LAW  INSTRUCTIONS: Expert testimony and scientific evidence in general are held to certain standards before they can be ruled as

SUBJECT: PSYCHOLOGY AND LAW  INSTRUCTIONS: Expert testimony and scientific evidence in general are held to certain standards before they can be ruled as admissible. In many jurisdictions, the standards are referred to as the Daubert standards. One procedure that has had a checkered history regarding admissibility in court is polygraph testing, done