8-1 Discussion: Course OutcomesReview the PSY 322 course outcomes, located on the Overview page of this course. The outcomes can also be viewed in the

8-1 Discussion: Course OutcomesReview the PSY 322 course outcomes, located on the Overview page of this course. The outcomes can also be viewed in the course syllabus. In this discussion, reflect on the work you have done in this course. Select one or two outcomes where you have made the biggest gains. For each outcome, explain what gains you have made and how you accomplished those gains, using a concrete example of a class assignment or project that helped you develop competencies toward the outcome you selected.

In responding to your peers, compare your experiences. To complete this assignment, review the Discussion Rubric.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Assessment Description According to our text, spirituality plays a significant role in African American culture, yet, historically, the majority of

Assessment Description According to our text, spirituality plays a significant role in African American culture, yet, historically, the majority of counselors see themselves as “nonreligious.” How would you utilize the spirituality of an African American client as a resource in helping them manage their mental health issues? Use the GCU Statement

SUBJECT: PSYCHOLOGY AND LAW   INSTRUCTIONS: Expert testimony and scientific evidence in general are held to certain standards before they can be ruled as

SUBJECT: PSYCHOLOGY AND LAW   INSTRUCTIONS: Expert testimony and scientific evidence in general are held to certain standards before they can be ruled as admissible. In many jurisdictions, the standards are referred to as the Daubert standards. One procedure that has had a checkered history regarding admissibility in court is polygraph testing, done

SUBJECT: PSYCHOLOGY AND LAW  INSTRUCTIONS: Expert testimony and scientific evidence in general are held to certain standards before they can be ruled as

SUBJECT: PSYCHOLOGY AND LAW  INSTRUCTIONS: Expert testimony and scientific evidence in general are held to certain standards before they can be ruled as admissible. In many jurisdictions, the standards are referred to as the Daubert standards. One procedure that has had a checkered history regarding admissibility in court is polygraph testing, done