1. Discussion Question: Create a post with a discussion question.  This can be a short post, just a sentence or three, that poses an

1.
Discussion Question: Create a post with a discussion question.  This can be a short post, just a sentence or three, that poses an interesting question.  For example, “Based on the material from this week, what additional research do psychologists need to conduct to continue to understand and reduce racial prejudice?”  Or “In addition to business meetings and juries, what are some other situations where we could see group decision-making happening in the real world?  And what would potential problems could arise during such a meeting?”

2.
Two Discussion Replies: Provide a reply to at least two different questions that someone else has posed.  Your reply should be at least a paragraph long, at least 150 words long.  You can also reply to other people’s replies instead of just the question.  In your reply, you must reference material that we have covered that week and how it relates to the question, but you can certainly expand on your reply beyond the material and discuss your own ideas as well.  For example, “In keeping with what we learned about the bystander effect, because more bystanders present doesn’t necessarily increase the chances of receiving help, I recommend trying to point at one person specifically to ask for help.  The idea is to make that person feel some amount of responsibility in the situation.  Additionally, I would recommend…..(reply continues up to 150 words or more)”  That reply references the material from the week (the bystander effect) but it also includes the student’s opinion on what to do in such a situation. 

An example of an insufficient reply would be either one that is too short (less than 150 words) or one that only mentions the student’s opinion but does not specifically discuss something that was covered in that week’s material.  For example, in the previous example, if the student would have just replied, “I recommend trying to point at one person specifically to ask for help.  Etc.”  In this case, the student doesn’t describe the bystander effect and how it’s a problem before going into their own opinions.     

To summarize, each week you need to create a discussion question as well as reply to two different questions that someone else generated. 

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

 Review the two classic psychology studies (Milgram’s Obedience to Authority and Zimbardo’s Stamford Prison Experiment) under Readings and Resources. 

 Review the two classic psychology studies (Milgram’s Obedience to Authority and Zimbardo’s Stamford Prison Experiment) under Readings and Resources.  Using evidence from Chapter 3 of your textbook, as well as the American Psychological Association’s Ethical Principles and Code of Conduct, discuss two (2) ways in which research ethics were violated

Part 4.1 Adolescent DevelopmentYou read chapters about middle childhood through early adolescence. Consider that there are many challenges for this

Part 4.1 Adolescent Development You read chapters about middle childhood through early adolescence. Consider that there are many challenges for this age group: peer relationships, puberty, sexual identity, multicultural development, media/social media and anxiety to name a few. Reflect on your own experiences growing up when thinking about this assignment.

Nicole E Costanzo  SundayApr 21 at 10:37am Police Psychology: Individual therapy and counseling. Intervention. Motivational interviewing. Individual

Nicole E Costanzo  SundayApr 21 at 10:37am Police Psychology: Individual therapy and counseling. Intervention. Motivational interviewing. Individual therapy and counseling for police officers involve providing support tailored to the unique stressors and challenges they face in their occupation. The therapeutic approach of motivational interviewing aims to help those in the

Instructions are attached  supporting doc attached Presenter’s Name:Gregory

Instructions are attached  supporting doc attached  Presenter’s Name: Gregory Swim Person Providing Critique: Brianna Davis Component Comments Case summary: Case was summarized in a succinct, easy-to-understand manner and was in the presenter’s own words. I understood the issue confronting the Supreme Court. APA’s brief: The APA’s stance was presented in

Instructions are attached  supporting doc attached Presenter’s Name:Lila Davis

Instructions are attached  supporting doc attached  Presenter’s Name: Lila Davis Person Providing Critique: Brianna Davis Component Comments Case summary: Case was summarized in a succinct, easy-to-understand manner and was in the presenter’s own words. I understood the issue confronting the Supreme Court. APA’s brief: The APA’s stance was presented in