Each post has to demonstrate a meaningful synthesis of the material posted (typically a research article) and the corresponding chapter assigned for

Each post has to demonstrate a meaningful synthesis of the material posted (typically a research article) and the corresponding chapter assigned for that week. Keep in mind that your discussion forum postings will likely be seen by other members of the course. Care should be taken when determining what to post.

Specifically, your posts should be critically reflecting on each week’s postings, relate it back to the week’s chapter, and will be graded based on your ability to connect the two in a thoughtful and coherent way. You can earn up to 3 points per post, please refer to the attached rubric when submitting your post to see the criteria upon which you will be graded. Keep in mind that these posts are meant to flow as a dialogue between all students enrolled in the class. It is very important that you reference your readings in these weekly posts as just making a post does not guarantee points. Your grade for each post will be based on the quality of your response. Hence, giving a blanket “I agree/I disagree” answers or opinions that anyone could write without having an in-depth understanding of the material assigned will not be accepted. It is also important that you read the week’s posting in its entirety. It is highly recommended to read previous posts so that you do not write similar ideas. Again, part of the grading criteria includes the student’s ability to add value to the ongoing discussion by connecting the material with information from the book and possibly outside sources. Postings should be no longer than two paragraphs and should show your understanding of the week’s readings.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

 Review the two classic psychology studies (Milgram’s Obedience to Authority and Zimbardo’s Stamford Prison Experiment) under Readings and Resources. 

 Review the two classic psychology studies (Milgram’s Obedience to Authority and Zimbardo’s Stamford Prison Experiment) under Readings and Resources.  Using evidence from Chapter 3 of your textbook, as well as the American Psychological Association’s Ethical Principles and Code of Conduct, discuss two (2) ways in which research ethics were violated

Part 4.1 Adolescent DevelopmentYou read chapters about middle childhood through early adolescence. Consider that there are many challenges for this

Part 4.1 Adolescent Development You read chapters about middle childhood through early adolescence. Consider that there are many challenges for this age group: peer relationships, puberty, sexual identity, multicultural development, media/social media and anxiety to name a few. Reflect on your own experiences growing up when thinking about this assignment.

Nicole E Costanzo  SundayApr 21 at 10:37am Police Psychology: Individual therapy and counseling. Intervention. Motivational interviewing. Individual

Nicole E Costanzo  SundayApr 21 at 10:37am Police Psychology: Individual therapy and counseling. Intervention. Motivational interviewing. Individual therapy and counseling for police officers involve providing support tailored to the unique stressors and challenges they face in their occupation. The therapeutic approach of motivational interviewing aims to help those in the

Instructions are attached  supporting doc attached Presenter’s Name:Gregory

Instructions are attached  supporting doc attached  Presenter’s Name: Gregory Swim Person Providing Critique: Brianna Davis Component Comments Case summary: Case was summarized in a succinct, easy-to-understand manner and was in the presenter’s own words. I understood the issue confronting the Supreme Court. APA’s brief: The APA’s stance was presented in

Instructions are attached  supporting doc attached Presenter’s Name:Lila Davis

Instructions are attached  supporting doc attached  Presenter’s Name: Lila Davis Person Providing Critique: Brianna Davis Component Comments Case summary: Case was summarized in a succinct, easy-to-understand manner and was in the presenter’s own words. I understood the issue confronting the Supreme Court. APA’s brief: The APA’s stance was presented in