CHAPTER 5 :Criminal Profiling   Each student is required to write 1 post on the discussion board for each chapter. Each post has to demonstrate a

CHAPTER 5 :Criminal Profiling 

 Each student is required to write 1 post on the discussion board for each chapter. Each post has to demonstrate a meaningful synthesis of the material posted (like a research article) and the corresponding chapter assigned. Keep in mind that your discussion forum postings will likely be seen by other members of the course. Care should be taken when determining what to post.

Specifically, your posts should be critically reflecting on each week’s postings, relate them back to the week’s chapter, and will be graded based on your ability to connect the two in a thoughtful and coherent way. You can earn up to 3 points per post, please refer to the attached rubric when submitting your post to see the criteria upon which you will be graded. Keep in mind that these posts are meant to flow as a dialogue between all students enrolled in the class. It is very important that you reference your readings in these weekly posts as just making a post does not guarantee points. Your grade for each post will be based on the quality of your response. Hence, giving a blanket “I agree/I disagree” answers or opinions that anyone could write without having an in-depth understanding of the material assigned will not be accepted. It is also important that you read the week’s posting in its entirety. It is highly recommended to read previous posts so that you do not write similar ideas. Again, part of the grading criteria includes the student’s ability to add value to the ongoing discussion by connecting the material with information from the book and possibly outside sources. Postings should be no shorter or longer than two paragraphs and should show your understanding of the week’s readings.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

500 word response 2 references/intext citationsDue 1/22/2025Answer the two questions

500 word response 2 references/intext citations Due 1/22/2025 Answer the two questions below Rule Making Process Case Study:   Food Stamps and Fast Food   Bloomberg Businessweek reported in November of 2011 on an interesting and controversial fast-food and government benefits controversy. The giant fast-food company, Yum Brands, wants government to allow low-income

300 word response 2 references/intext citationDue 1/22/2025Post 2: Q2 Consider how the

300 word response 2 references/intext citation Due 1/22/2025 Post 2: Q2 Consider how the psychological and environmental factors of the location impact both the subject and the investigator during an interview or interrogation. How might cultural norms, environmental distractions, or perceived power dynamics influence the effectiveness of the interaction? Provide

300 word response 2 references/intext citationDue 1/22/2025Post 1: Q1 Beyond its

300 word response 2 references/intext citation Due 1/22/2025 Post 1: Q1 Beyond its definition, how does “class characteristic” influence the broader context of evidence analysis in criminal investigations? Consider scenarios where class characteristics might be misleading or insufficient. Provide an example where reliance on class characteristics alone could lead to

Assignment 2Use references/intext citationsDue 1/23/2025 Each State has many

Assignment 2 Use references/intext citations Due 1/23/2025 Each State has many administrative agencies that have the power and authority to make regulations, enforce the regulations, and try violators in their own mini-court systems with administrative law judges.  Go to this link which lists Florida State Agencies:  https://dos.myflorida.com/library-archives/research/florida-information/government/state-resources/state-agency-homepages.   and select an