Assignment 4 – Managerial Dilemmas (10%) (Objective 4)   Describe how Covey’s principle-centered leadership skills can be used

Assignment 4 – Managerial Dilemmas (10%) (Objective 4)

 

Describe how Covey’s principle-centered leadership skills can be used to effectively resolve managerial issues. Briefly, give an example of a managerial issue and how it was resolved in your workplace (you may alter or omit names if you like). Why do you think there was an effective or ineffective resolution based on the outcome of your example? Would you have handled this dilemma in the same way?  If not, what would you have done differently?

This paper should be approximately 4 pages in length (including the cover page and References).

 

View Rubric

Written Assignments (100 pts)

Written Assignments (100 pts)

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

Relevance 20%

20 to >18 pts

Exceptional

Written account of the learning experience is relevant and meaningful to student, to assignment requirements, AND overall course goals.

18 to >16 pts

Above Average

Written account of the learning experience is relevant and meaningful to student, assignment requirements, OR overall course goals.

16 to >13 pts

Average

Attempts to demonstrate relevance (to either the student, assignment, OR overall course goals) but the relevance is unclear to the reader.

13 to >0 pts

Below Average

Parts of the reflection are not made relevant to the student, assignment requirements, and/or overall course learning goals.

/ 20 pts

Analysis 20%

20 to >18 pts

Exceptional

Moves beyond simple description to an analysis of how the experience contributed to student’s understanding of self, others, AND course concepts.

18 to >16 pts

Above Average

The reflection demonstrates student attempts to analyze by addressing understanding of self, others, OR course concepts.

16 to >13 pts

Average

Attempts applying the learning to understanding of self, others, and/or course concepts but relies primarily on description of concept.

13 to >0 pts

Below Average

Reflection does not move beyond description of the learning prompt(s).

/ 20 pts

Synthesis 25%

25 to >23 pts

Exceptional

The reflection demonstrates connections between the experience and material from other courses; past experience; AND/OR personal goals.

23 to >21 pts

Above Average

Demonstrates connections between the experience and material from other courses; past experience; or personal goals.

21 to >17 pts

Average

Little to no attempt to demonstrate connections between the learning experience and previous other personal OR learning experiences.

17 to >0 pts

Below Average

No attempt to demonstrate connections to previous learning or experience.

/ 25 pts

Self Reflection 25%

25 to >23 pts

Exceptional

Demonstrates ability to question biases, stereotypes, assumptions, preconceptions, AND defines new modes of thinking as a result.

23 to >21 pts

Above Average

Demonstrates ability to question biases, stereotypes, and preconceptions.

21 to >17 pts

Average

Some attempt at growth mindset thought patterns, but fails to demonstrate awareness of personal biases, etc.

17 to >0 pts

Below Average

No attempt at growth mindset thought patterns.

/ 25 pts

Clarity 10%

10 to >9 pts

Exceptional

Language is clear and expressive. Abstract concepts are explained accurately. Explanation of concepts could make sense to an uninformed reader.

9 to >8 pts

Above Average

Minor, infrequent lapses in clarity and accuracy. Grammatical or mechanical errors that largely do not interfere with meaning.

8 to >6 pts

Average

There are frequent lapses in clarity and accuracy. Grammatical or mechanical errors may interfere with meaning.

6 to >0 pts

Below Average

Grammatical or mechanical errors result in confusion for reader. Concepts are either omitted or are presented inaccurately.

/ 10 pts

Total Points:100

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Criterion1. Unsatisfactory

Criterion 1. Unsatisfactory 2. Insufficient 3. Approaching 4. Acceptable 5. Target Summary of each theory 0 points Summary of each theory is inaccurate and fails to include the timeline in which the theory was developed. 25.87 points Summary of each theory is confusing and partially includes the timeline in which the theory was developed. 27.75 points Summary of

I need help with my video presentation. Required Resource:A Collaborative and Supplemental Model to Enhance Early Language and Reading Skills

I need help with my video presentation.  Required Resource: A Collaborative and Supplemental Model to Enhance Early Language and Reading Skills Required Read “A Collaborative and Supplemental Model to Enhance Early Language and Reading Skills,” by Nguyen et al., from  Reading. … Read More School–Family Partnerships for Culturally Sustaining Texts Required

  Topic: After conducting independent research, respond to the following questions: What if the Internet in your company/organization went down for a

  Topic: After conducting independent research, respond to the following questions: What if the Internet in your company/organization went down for a day. 1. How would this impact the company/organization?  2. What issues might arise from having no Internet?  3. What plans have been established to compensate for having no internet access?  

  Create a Storyboard using  Power PointTracing  the main process of language development, create/develop a story using  at least two or more

  Create a Storyboard using  Power Point Tracing  the main process of language development, create/develop a story using  at least two or more characters/ persons to illustrate your  understanding of language development. Ex: Storyboard illustrating a  mother, father or caregiver over time interacting with and nurturing  their child throughout this

Use the attached Excel spreadsheet below. You will notice there are two tabs at the bottom of the spreadsheet. Please provide brief responses to the

Use the attached Excel spreadsheet below. You will notice there are two tabs at the bottom of the spreadsheet. Please provide brief responses to the questions on the first tab (i.e., “Research Purpose”).  On the second tab (i.e., “Literature Map”), locate a minimum of 10 peer-reviewed articles and use the spreadsheet to document information relevant