Ethical Lens Paper 6-8 pages For this task, you will respond to an ethical situation as well as analyze the results of the Ethical Lens Inventory (ELI),

Ethical Lens Paper 6-8 pages

For this task, you will respond to an ethical situation as well as analyze the results of the Ethical Lens Inventory (ELI), which should be completed in the course. This task focuses on you as a leader by helping you to define, refine, and test your ethical boundaries through self-reflection and analysis.

SCENARIOYou are a sales representative for a medical device company that manufactures artificial joints. Your company has developed an artificial knee joint that is less expensive than the competition and will dramatically reduce healing time for patients. However, it is also known to produce a serious and potentially lethal infection in a small percentage of patients. The company refuses to disclose this potential side effect. You feel you have a duty to divulge this issue, but you signed a nondisclosure agreement when you were hired and worry about possible repercussions.REQUIREMENTS 

  A.  Select a nonfictional leader who you feel has exhibited exemplary ethical conduct and do the following:

1.  Discuss two ethical traits your chosen leader has demonstrated.

2.  Explain how your chosen leader has exhibited ethical conduct. 

Note: The chosen leader can be someone you know personally or someone famous. 

B.  Compare the deontological and consequentialist perspectives and how each perspective would approach the dilemma from the scenario. 

C.  Identify and explain which level of cognitive moral development (i.e., preconventional, conventional, or postconventional) is represented in the scenario for each of the following questions:

•  Which action would most likely serve the greater good in society?

•  If I reveal this information, will I get into trouble and possibly even lose my job?

•  Which action best aligns with my long-held belief in the principle of justice?

•  What do the laws say, and what would a law-abiding citizen do?

•  If I keep quiet, will I get some sort of reward? 

D.  Reflect on your Ethical Lens Inventory (ELI) by doing the following:

1.  Explain your preferred ethical lens, relevant to the ELI.

a.  Analyze whether you have the same preferred lens in different settings (e.g., work, personal, social).

2.  Explain one of your primary values and one classical virtue from the ELI. 

Note: If you are a Center Perspective, choose any primary value. 

a.  Compare your primary value from part D2 with one of your own self-identified or personal values. Then compare your classical virtue from part D2 with a different self-identified or personal value. 

Note: Examples of personal values can be found in the attached “Clarifying Your Values” chart. 

3.  Describe one of the following from your ELI:

•  blind spot

•  risk

•  double standard

•  vice

a.  Discuss two steps you can take to mitigate the blind spot, risk, double standard, or vice described in part D3 in order to make better ethical decisions in the future.

4.  Discuss how the information from your ELI could be applied to an ethical situation in the workplace. 

  Acknowledge sources, using in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Discussion Thread: Setting Direction, Advantages / Disadvantages, and Decision Models Strategy is critical to the process of charting a company’s

Discussion Thread: Setting Direction, Advantages / Disadvantages, and Decision Models Strategy is critical to the process of charting a company’s direction in the business environment. When evaluating strategic choices, it is important to understand key advantages and disadvantages of the various options under consideration. Decision models continue to impact strategy

REPLIES: INSTRUCTIONSThe student must reply to at least two classmates’ threads by 11:59 p.m. (ET) Sunday of theassigned Module: Week. Your replies must

REPLIES: INSTRUCTIONSThe student must reply to at least two classmates’ threads by 11:59 p.m. (ET) Sunday of theassigned Module: Week. Your replies must include meaningful and substantive contributions tothe discussion, and ideally provoke and challenge the thinking of your colleagues. Each replymust be 200-300 words.Replies: Specific Reference RequirementsFor Discussion Replies:

Discussion Thread: Exploring Employee Engagement, Globalization, and Christian Worldview Thread: Specific Reference RequirementsFor Discussion Thread:

Discussion Thread: Exploring Employee Engagement, Globalization, and Christian Worldview Thread: Specific Reference RequirementsFor Discussion Thread: Introducing HR and Christian Worldview and Discussion Thread: Shapingthe Future of HR, include a references section, and be sure to have in-text citations for thefollowing sources:• At least 2 citations from Valentine: Human Resource Management.•

Discussion Thread: Strategy Development, Strategy Decisions, and Decision ModelsDeveloping strategy begins with thinking strategically and knowing what

Discussion Thread: Strategy Development, Strategy Decisions, and Decision ModelsDeveloping strategy begins with thinking strategically and knowing what the key decisions are. Thedecision models that you employ will directly impact the quality of the decisions you make sounderstanding them is critical.Minimum of 500 words in the body.Minimum of 2 sources from

REPLIES: INSTRUCTIONSThe student must reply to at least two classmates’ threads by 11:59 p.m. (ET) Sunday of theassigned Module: Week. Your replies must

REPLIES: INSTRUCTIONSThe student must reply to at least two classmates’ threads by 11:59 p.m. (ET) Sunday of theassigned Module: Week. Your replies must include meaningful and substantive contributions tothe discussion, and ideally provoke and challenge the thinking of your colleagues. Each replymust be 200-300 words.Replies: Specific Reference RequirementsFor Discussion Replies:

Discussion Thread: Introducing HR and Christian Worldview Keller’s big-picture thinking relative to work in God’s world (Chapters 1–4) can be interpreted

Discussion Thread: Introducing HR and Christian Worldview Keller’s big-picture thinking relative to work in God’s world (Chapters 1–4) can be interpreted as follows: Design —God designed humans to work; Dignity —work gives humans dignity; Cultivation —God continues to “create” through the work of humans; Service —humans love God and neighbor