GASTROINTESTINAL DISORDERSIn this exercise, you will complete a Mind Map Template to gauge your understanding of this week’s content. Select one of

GASTROINTESTINAL DISORDERS

In this exercise, you will complete a Mind Map Template to gauge your understanding of this week’s content. Select one of the possible topics provided to complete your MindMap Template.

· Ulcers

· After HP shots

· Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

· Pancreatitis

· Liver failure—acute and chronic

· Gall bladder disease

· Inflammatory bowel disease

· Diverticulitis

· Jaundice

· Bilirubin

· Gastrointestinal bleed – upper and lower

· Hepatic encephalopathy

· Intra-abdominal infections (e.g., appendicitis)

RESOURCES

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources. 


WEEKLY RESOURCES

BY DAY 7 OF WEEK 5

Submit your MindMap Template by Day 7 of Week 5.

 

Rubric

NURS_6501_Week 3, 5, 7, 9_Mind Map Assignment_Rubric

NURS_6501_Week 3, 5, 7, 9_Mind Map Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSelect one of the possible topics provided and complete the MindMap Template.

1) Describe the pathophysiology of the primary diagnosis in your own words. What are the patient’s risk factors for this diagnosis?

20 to >17.0 pts

Excellent

A thoroughly completed MindMap Template with a selected topic was submitted. The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail the pathophysiology of the primary diagnosis in the student’s own words. The response accurately and thoroughly explains in detail the patient’s risk factors for this diagnosis.

17 to >14.0 pts

Good

A completed MindMap Template with a selected topic was submitted. The response describes the pathophysiology of the primary diagnosis in the student’s own words. The response explains the patient’s risk factors for this diagnosis.

14 to >12.0 pts

Fair

An inaccurately complete or vague MindMap Template with a selected topic was submitted. The response inaccurately or vaguely describes the pathophysiology of the primary diagnosis in the student’s own words. The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the patient’s risk factors for this diagnosis.

12 to >0 pts

Poor

An incomplete MindMap Template with a selected topic was submitted, or is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely describes the pathophysiology of the primary diagnosis in the student’s own words, or is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely describes the patient’s risk factors for this diagnosis, or is missing.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome2) What are the patient’s signs and symptoms for this diagnosis? How does the diagnosis impact other body systems and what are the possible complications?

20 to >17.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail the patient’s signs and symptoms for this diagnosis. The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail how this diagnosis might impact other body systems and their possible complications.

17 to >14.0 pts

Good

The response accurately describes the patient’s signs and symptoms for this diagnosis. The response accurately describes how this diagnosis might impact other body systems and their possible complications.

14 to >12.0 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely describes the patient’s signs and symptoms for this diagnosis. The response inaccurately or vaguely describes how this diagnosis might impact other body systems and their possible complications.

12 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely describes the patient’s signs and symptoms for this diagnosis, or is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely describes how the diagnosis might impact other body systems and their possible complications, or is missing.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome3) What are other potential diagnosis that present in a similar way to this diagnosis (differentials)?

20 to >17.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and completely describes in detail the potential diagnoses that present in a similar way to the diagnosis provided.

17 to >14.0 pts

Good

The response accurately describes the potential diagnoses that present in a similar way to the diagnosis provided.

14 to >12.0 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely describes the potential diagnoses that present in a similar way to the diagnosis provided.

12 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely describes the potential diagnoses that present in a similar way to the diagnosis provided, or is missing.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome4) What diagnostic tests or labs would you order to rule out the differentials for this patient or confirm the primary diagnosis?

20 to >17.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail the diagnostic tests and labs they would order to rule out the differentials for this patient, and in confirming the primary diagnosis.

17 to >14.0 pts

Good

The response accurately describes the diagnostic tests and labs they would order to rule out the differentials for this patient, and in confirming the primary diagnosis.

14 to >12.0 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely describes the diagnostic tests and labs they would order to rule out the differentials for this patient, and in confirming the primary diagnosis.

12 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely describes the diagnostic tests and labs they would order to rule out the differentials for this patient, and in confirming the primary diagnosis, or is missing.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome5) What treatment options would you consider? Include possible referrals and medications.

20 to >17.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail the treatment options they would consider. The response accurately and thoroughly describes potential referrals and medications.

17 to >14.0 pts

Good

The response accurately describes the treatment options they would consider. They response accurately describes potential referrals and medications.

14 to >12.0 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely describes the treatment options they would consider. The response inaccurately or vaguely describes potential referrals and medications.

12 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely describes the treatment options they would consider, or is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely describes possible referrals and medications, or is missing.

20 pts

Total Points: 100

This week we will focus on GI disorders. See below for more information on what assignments are due this week. 

Patients of gastrointestinal disorders often face life-altering changes, including changes to diet, new treatment regimens, and more. For some disorders, treatments can include surgery.

Gastrointestinal conditions, such as ulcers, diverticulitis, and pancreatitis, often cause varying levels of pain and discomfort. This week, you examine fundamental concepts of gastrointestinal disorders. You explore common disorders in this category, and you apply the key terms and concepts that help communicate the pathophysiological nature of these issues to patients.

image1.jpeg

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

SOAP Note _______ NU___:_________ Herzing University

SOAP Note _______ NU___:_________ Herzing University Name:_________________________ Typhon Encounter #: _____________________ Comprehensive:____Focused:____ S: SUBJECTIVE DATA CC: What are they being seen for? This is the reason that the patient sought care, stated in their own words/words of their caregiver, or paraphrased. HPI: Use the “OLDCART” approach for collecting data and

SOAP Note _______ NU___:_________ Herzing University

SOAP Note _______ NU___:_________ Herzing University Name:_________________________ Typhon Encounter #: _____________________ Comprehensive:____Focused:____ S: SUBJECTIVE DATA CC: What are they being seen for? This is the reason that the patient sought care, stated in their own words/words of their caregiver, or paraphrased. HPI: Use the “OLDCART” approach for collecting data and

   Reflect upon your current or previous workplace organization, and consider the organizational mission, vision, and values, as well as the

   Reflect upon your current or previous workplace organization, and consider the organizational mission, vision, and values, as well as the organizational culture, and leadership practices then discuss the following:  (work place organizaton is RWJBarnabas Health) Include the following sections:  Application of Course Knowledge:      Answer all questions/criteria with explanations and detail.  State  the

Learner’s Need Assignment [Student Name] [Course Number]: [Course Name] [Professor’s Name] West Coast University Los Angeles Campus [Due

Learner’s Need Assignment [Student Name] [Course Number]: [Course Name] [Professor’s Name] West Coast University Los Angeles Campus [Due Date] Learners Needs Assignment Learning Style Assessment [What does the client (patient/family) say about their learning style?] Teaching Approach [How will you teach a client with this learning style?] Readiness Evaluation [How

Criterion 1Design evidence-based interventions to mitigate population health risks.

Criterion 1 Design evidence-based interventions to mitigate population health risks. Distinguished Designs evidence-based interventions to mitigate population health risks, providing support for why these are the most appropriate interventions. Proficient Designs evidence-based interventions to mitigate population health risks. Basic Designs interventions, though they may not be supported by evidence or