See attachments Instructions: You are to compare information that the general public would normally see with what you know is accurate from

See attachments 

Instructions:

You are to compare information that the general public would normally see with what you know is accurate from academic sources regarding an issue. Your task is to first summarize what you find in two popular media sources (e.g., popular press book, TV shows, movies, podcasts, news articles, etc.). Next, you will analyze how the issue is portrayed by comparing it to academic sources attached. You can present this as a point-counterpoint way if you choose. In this way, you may say that the popular press says “X” about people with mental illness, but we know that “Y” is actually true based off an academic resource that is attached. You must provide four references from the articles attached for each media source, totaling 8 references.

Your objective is to critically analyze the topic so that you can get a better understanding of what the public may believe versus what it actually the case. In this way, it is not productive to choose outlandish articles, but those that may be reasonably believed.

 

The final product should be approximately 4-6 pages (two to three pages per source). 100% NO PLAGIARISM AS IT WILL BE UPLOADED INTO TURN IT IN!!!

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

100 word response1 reference/intext citationDue 1/10/2025

100 word response 1 reference/intext citation Due 1/10/2025 Shroeder Post 2 Q2: The orientations of trying to prove a case and uncovering the truth aren’t necessarily different. If investigators coexist, between both, it takes balance. The main goal should be uncovering the truth. Uncovering the truth despite the tension is

100 word response1 reference/intext citationDue 1/10/2025Epps

100 word response 1 reference/intext citation Due 1/10/2025 Epps Post 2 Q2: Investigators often face tension between striving to prove a case and uncovering the truth. Are these orientations fundamentally different, or can they coexist within investigative work? Choose one orientation, explain your perspective, and use a real or hypothetical

100 word response1 reference/intext citationDue 1/10/2025

100 word response 1 reference/intext citation Due 1/10/2025 Schroeder Post 1 Q1: “Reconstructing the past” intersects with investigative methods by piecing together events, memories, and behaviors to make a timeline. This allows us to understand what happened before, during, and after. Technologies aid this process. For example, forensic analysis, surveillance,

100 word response1 reference/intext citationDue 1/10/2025Bet

100 word response 1 reference/intext citation Due 1/10/2025 Bet Post 1 Q1: “Reconstructing the past” intersects with investigative methods in more than one way, and particularly in the area of criminal investigations. The process of reconstructing the past involves accumulating pieces of evidence to put together and gain a better

Use references/intext citationsDue 1/10/2025Researching Federal Administrative Agencies

Use references/intext citations Due 1/10/2025 Researching Federal Administrative Agencies There are many federal administrative agencies and sub-agencies that have the power and authority to make regulations, enforce the regulations, and try violators in their own mini-court systems with administrative law judges.  Play this informational video (all parts) on how to