Week 1 Discussion – Ethics of Social Psychology Research | GradedWeek 1 Discussion– Discussing the ethics of

Week 1 Discussion – Ethics of Social Psychology Research | Graded

Week 1 Discussion– Discussing the ethics of social psychology research: The case of the Milgram study on Obedience to Authority

Prompt:

The ethics of conducting research, especially when it involves risk. Watch either of the videos linked below that depict the Milgram study on Obedience to Authority. As you watch, think about both the importance of the knowledge potentially gained by such research, as well as the potential risks to participants given the psychological stress that the study put them through.
To what extent is such research “worth” the risks potentially facing participants?
What ethical guidelines should govern the conduct of this research?

YouTube video on the Milgram study on obedience to authority to be used for Discussion assignment. Watch
either one of these videos.

Brief 10 minute overview of the Milgram experiment

Minimum word requirement for initial posts is 250 words

·
In order to earn credit, all posts must be accompanied by at least one citation with accompanying reference outside of, or in addition to, the textbook. Wikipedia, ask.com, about.com and the like are not considered valid sources for any assignment in this course. Your post must adhere to APA citation rules. Grading will take into consideration grammar, spelling, organization, length, citations, knowledgeable content, display of logical reasoning, and adherence to APA citation and referencing

·
Your meaningful feedback in these responses should reflect all four categories of the RISE model presented below: Reflect, Inquire, Suggest, and Elevate

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

LEARNING RESOURCESRequired ReadingsFunder, D. C. (2024). The personality puzzle (9th ed.). W. W. Norton.Chapter 9, “Basics of

LEARNING RESOURCES Required Readings Funder, D. C. (2024). The personality puzzle (9th ed.). W. W. Norton. Chapter 9, “Basics of Psychoanalysis” Chapter 10, “Psychoanalysis After Freud: Neo-Freudians, Object Relations, and Current Research” Walden University Writing Center. (2021). Using quotations, part I. ( Required Media Walden University, LLC. (2022). Defense mechanisms

Please follow instructions and No Ai . Please no copyrightLEARNING RESOURCESRequired ReadingsFunder, D. C. (2024). The personality puzzle

Please follow instructions and No Ai . Please no copyright LEARNING RESOURCES Required Readings Funder, D. C. (2024). The personality puzzle (9th ed.). W. W. Norton. Chapter 9, “Basics of Psychoanalysis” Chapter 10, “Psychoanalysis After Freud: Neo-Freudians, Object Relations, and Current Research” Walden University Writing Center. (2021). Using quotations, part

Powerpoint presentation instructions are listed below PresentationGrading Rubric

Powerpoint presentation instructions are listed below  Presentation Grading Rubric PSYC2430 Name: Course: Title: Quality of Visual Aids ___/4 Script/knowledge of Material ___/3 Title and Hypothesis ___/3 Variables and Reasoning ___/3 Previous Research Review ___/3 Participants and Material ___/3 Procedure ___/3 Creativity ___/3 TOTAL ________ / 25 · Make sure to