WEEK 9 Welcome to Week 9. This week, you will explore methods for assessing the neurologic system. In order to help you prepare, you have several

WEEK 9

Welcome to Week 9. This week, you will explore methods for assessing the neurologic system. In order to help you prepare, you have several lecturio videos demonstrating the assessment techniques of the neurological system:

 


Lecturio ResourcesLinks to an external site.

Week 9 Videos 

·
Reflex Testing (09:00) 

·
Sensory Examination (08:30) 

·
Tests for Cervical and Lumbar Radiculopathy (07:18) 

·
Quick Review: Examination of the Motor Neurons (02:36) 

·
Patient Introduction and Review of the Etiology of Headache (02:30) 

·
Examination of the Cranial Nerves I–VI (11:12) 

·
Examination of the Cranial Nerves VII–XII (12:42) 

·
Examination of the Cerebellum (09:18) 

·
Examination of Cortical Sensation (05:12) 

·
Physical Findings in Meningitis (02:30) 

·
Quick Review: Examination of the Cranial Nerves (02:48) 

·
Nursing Assessment of the Neurological System: Theory and Glasgow Coma Scale (GSC) (11:12) 


Assignment

 

You will complete a comprehensive head-to-toe assessment for an i-Human Patients Assignment.

 

Your Patient: Well Woman Exam -Laura Woods

 

Note: You must achieve a total score of at least 80% in order to pass this Assignment. You must pass the Week 9 Assignment to pass the course. Carefully review the Assignment and the rubric to be sure you fully understand the requirements of this Assignment.

 

Please take the time to complete this assignment. If you have an issue with the technology, please get in touch with Ihuman support. Once your assignment has been completed, please upload it as required. You must also document in the EMR/EHR system. This is part of the grading process. Review your rubric before completing the assignment to make sure you cover all of the requirements. This will be a one-time submission.

As a tip to pass this assignment, I should remind you of the following:

1-Complete the EHR

2- Management: Medications, testing, education, and follow-up. Students MUST write the treatment rationale with APA references (check your APA manual)

3- Literature support MUST come from Journals and books. Internet sources or YouTube sources are not considered peer-reviewed and not valid

4- EHR history writing must be entirely in all spaces. Review of systems is ONLY subjective (symptoms). Physical exam MUST include a detailed physical exam of your patient.

 

Watch for lateness and Academic Integrity when completing your assignment.

There are no second chances, so you must complete I-Human, take your time with the case.

 

Good luck this week!

Dr. Delgado

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

COMPLETE ALL QUESTIONSThumbnails/thumbnail.png1) The ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting are approved by the FILL IN

COMPLETE ALL QUESTIONS Thumbnails/thumbnail.png 1) The ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting are approved by the FILL IN BLANK  parties for ICD-10-CM to accompany and complement the official conventions and instructions provided within ICD-10-CM. 2) Official coding guidelines use the term FILL IN BLANK  when referring to face-to-face contact between patients and health

  Questions Discussion Board: Instructions Purpose: The purpose of this assignment is to familiarize you the complexity of quantitative statistical

  Questions Discussion Board: Instructions Purpose: The purpose of this assignment is to familiarize you the complexity of quantitative statistical analysis. Instructions: For this discussion, please complete the following: Review the assigned chapters in Polit and Beck (2017): i.e., chapters 18-20. Identify five different facts or pieces of information that

***CASE STUDIES ATTACHED*** You should respond to both discussions separately–with constructive literature material- extending, refuting/correcting, or

***CASE STUDIES ATTACHED*** You should respond to both discussions separately–with constructive literature material- extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts.  Minimum 150 words each reply with references under each reply.  Incorporate a minimum of 2 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal