Assessment Description Darla is a Master of Science in Clinical Mental Health Counseling student working at her practicum site. Mike is a practicum student

Assessment Description

Darla is a Master of Science in Clinical Mental Health Counseling student working at her practicum site. Mike is a practicum student assigned to the same practicum site as Darla. Both Darla and Mike report directly to the same site supervisor. About halfway through the practicum, Darla realizes that many of the clients assigned to Mike for counseling are coming to see her. Comments from Mike’s clients have led Darla to believe that Mike is acting unethically. How should Darla handle this situation? What are the ethical and legal implications?

If Darla tells her supervisor, and her supervisor does not act on her concerns, what are the ethical and legal implications?

This discussion question is informed by the following CACREP Standards: 

2.F.1.m. The role of counseling supervision in the profession.

5.G.2.m. Legislation and government policy relevant to school counseling.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Assessment Description According to our text, spirituality plays a significant role in African American culture, yet, historically, the majority of

Assessment Description According to our text, spirituality plays a significant role in African American culture, yet, historically, the majority of counselors see themselves as “nonreligious.” How would you utilize the spirituality of an African American client as a resource in helping them manage their mental health issues? Use the GCU Statement

SUBJECT: PSYCHOLOGY AND LAW   INSTRUCTIONS: Expert testimony and scientific evidence in general are held to certain standards before they can be ruled as

SUBJECT: PSYCHOLOGY AND LAW   INSTRUCTIONS: Expert testimony and scientific evidence in general are held to certain standards before they can be ruled as admissible. In many jurisdictions, the standards are referred to as the Daubert standards. One procedure that has had a checkered history regarding admissibility in court is polygraph testing, done

SUBJECT: PSYCHOLOGY AND LAW  INSTRUCTIONS: Expert testimony and scientific evidence in general are held to certain standards before they can be ruled as

SUBJECT: PSYCHOLOGY AND LAW  INSTRUCTIONS: Expert testimony and scientific evidence in general are held to certain standards before they can be ruled as admissible. In many jurisdictions, the standards are referred to as the Daubert standards. One procedure that has had a checkered history regarding admissibility in court is polygraph testing, done