SEE ATTACHEDHere’s a tool you probably recognize: the Saint Leo Student Evaluation.  If this course is a training session then this would be the

SEE ATTACHED

Here’s a tool you probably recognize: the Saint Leo Student Evaluation.  If this course is a training session then this would be the Reaction-level Questionnaire!  It measures 

your opinions and perceptions
 about the instructor, course, textbook, etc. 


Student Evaluation Reaction Questionnaire

Critically review the content of the Student Evaluation (focus on the questions, not the format). 

· Does it meet the requirements of a good reaction questionnaire? Why or why not?

· Explain how you would improve the evaluation or the evaluation process (if possible). 

· Suggest ONE additional way to evaluate this course using either a 

Behavioral
 level evaluation or 

Result/ROI 
level evaluation.  

*********Choose Behavioral level evaluation**********

Please Cite:

Blanchard, P. N., and J. W. Thacker. “Organizational Strategy and Management Development.” Paper presented at the Global Business Trends Conference of the Academy of Business Administration, Acapulco, Mexico, 1998.

Kirkpatrick, D. L. “Techniques for Evaluating Training Programs.” Training and Development Journal 33, no. 6 (1979): 78–92; Kirkpatrick, D. L. “Evaluating In-House Training Programs.” In More Evaluating Training Programs—A Collection of Articles from Training and Development Journal, edited by D. L. Kirkpatrick. Alexandria, VA: American Society for Training and Development, 1987; Kirkpatrick, D. L. Evaluation of Training Programs: The Four Levels. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, 1998.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

See AttachedTCOB Graduate Studies Discussion RubricCriteria No Submission 0 pointsNovice (Criterion is missing or notin evidence) 1-13

See Attached TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric Criteria No Submission 0 points Novice (Criterion is missing or not in evidence) 1-13 points Basic (works towards meeting expectations; performance needs improvement) 14-16 points Proficient (meets expectations; performance is satisfactory) 17-18 points Exemplary (exceeds expectations; performance is outstanding) 19-20 points Support of

SEE ATTACHED.TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion RubricCriteria No Submission 0 pointsNovice (Criterion is missing or notin evidence) 1-13

SEE ATTACHED. TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric Criteria No Submission 0 points Novice (Criterion is missing or not in evidence) 1-13 points Basic (works towards meeting expectations; performance needs improvement) 14-16 points Proficient (meets expectations; performance is satisfactory) 17-18 points Exemplary (exceeds expectations; performance is outstanding) 19-20 points Support of

Scenario Wesley Enterprises is a long-term care facility. The organization was recently cited for deficiencies including infectious disease planning

Scenario Wesley Enterprises is a long-term care facility. The organization was recently cited for deficiencies including infectious disease planning and staffing deficiencies. The CEO has decided to hire a consulting firm to evaluate its current processes and make recommendations for improvement. Upon initial review, the consulting firm has determined that

Critical thinking—consider what you have learned in this chapter reading. Students will complete the required assignment by following the instructions

Critical thinking—consider what you have learned in this chapter reading. Students will complete the required assignment by following the instructions below. SCENARIO: Your company, a growing firm in the financial services industry, is extremely sensitive to the issues surrounding business ethics. The company wants to be proactive in developing a

SWEE ATTACHED TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion RubricCriteria No Submission 0 pointsNovice (Criterion is missing or notin evidence) 1-13

SWEE ATTACHED  TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric Criteria No Submission 0 points Novice (Criterion is missing or not in evidence) 1-13 points Basic (works towards meeting expectations; performance needs improvement) 14-16 points Proficient (meets expectations; performance is satisfactory) 17-18 points Exemplary (exceeds expectations; performance is outstanding) 19-20 points Support of