see attached 7:  Final reflection of the course After studying the material discussed during the week, do the

see attached 

7: 
Final reflection of the course 

After studying the material discussed during the week, do the following: 

1. Review one topic or philosopher you studied in this course.

2. Think about how the philosopher’s ideas affected you. It could be that you agree or disagree with them.

3. Write on your reflection.

4. Support your thesis statement with a good argument presenting justification for your ideas.

Remember to review the 

academic expectations
 for your submission.

Submission Instructions:

· Submit your initial discussion post by 11:59 p.m. ET on Wednesday and react critically to at least two of your classmates’ discussion posts by 11:59 p.m. ET on Saturday.

· Contribute a minimum of 250 words to the initial post. 

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

  Hi All, Dr. Deats, a psychiatrist who interviewed Richard Kuklinski, referred to as the Iceman, utilized the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) an

  Hi All, Dr. Deats, a psychiatrist who interviewed Richard Kuklinski, referred to as the Iceman, utilized the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) and the Psychopathic Personality Inventory-Revised (PPI-R) to measure his psychopathic characteristics. The PCL-R, created by Robert Hare, assesses psychopathy through 20 criteria divided into two primary factors: Interpersonal/Affective and

  The assessment measures that the psychiatrist used seem to be various questions or an interview-style assessment. He asked various questions about

  The assessment measures that the psychiatrist used seem to be various questions or an interview-style assessment. He asked various questions about Richard’s childhood, thoughts, feelings, beliefs, morals, reasons for his crimes, people, family, and children. Richard Kuklinski has various psychopathic traits that the psychiatrist was attempting to fish out.

    Based on the current discussion on assessing reliability, James et al. (1984) discuss approaches to assessing inter-rater agreement (see attached a

    Based on the current discussion on assessing reliability, James et al. (1984) discuss approaches to assessing inter-rater agreement (see attached article). How do their findings inform best practices for improving rater reliability in applied settings? Answering this challenge question “counts” as a discussion respond    rwg James et