Research Study Proposal Part 2 (I have enclosed Part 1 of the topic of brain injuries) In

Research Study Proposal Part 2 (I have enclosed Part 1 of the topic of brain injuries)

In this class, you will complete a Research Study Proposal. In this hypothetical research study proposal, you will investigate a social-psychological issue of your choice. The Research Study Proposal is divided into three pieces:

 

· Research Study Proposal Part 1, due in week 3

· Research Study Proposal Part 2, due in week 5

· Research Study Proposal Part 3, due in week 8.

 

Research Study Proposal Part 2 is the literature review piece for your final proposal. This is where you will identify and discuss what is already known about your topic. You will be presenting what previous researchers have discovered, what methods they used, what variables were considered, and what demographics were used. In other words, you will be summarizing and synthesizing the current research. The literature review is also where you identify what is 


not

 known (i.e., the gap in the literature that makes your research focus important).

 


Requirements: Research Study Proposal Part 2

· Utilizing the topic selected for the Research Study Proposal Part 1, you are to find scholarly articles with which you will compile a literature review.

 

·

· Article Selection

· You must have at least 6 scholarly articles.

· Make sure that you have scholarly articles for all variables associated with your topic.

 

·

· Article Summary

· You will need to summarize the research.

· As noted above, the literature review is where you present what is currently known about your topic. Thus, you will need to provide information on research discoveries, methodologies, variables, and participants.

 

·

· Alignment with Research

· You will need to tie the research together.

· You will need to indicate how the articles align with your proposed research topic. 

· You will need to indicate how all of the articles work together to help form your research study proposal.


Structural Formatting

 

· The literature review should have its own introduction that clearly indicates what aspects will be covered in the literature review, as well as how the research study proposal will help fill in the gaps in the current scholarship.

 

· You must have at least 6 scholarly articles.

 

· The literature review should be at least 4 pages in length.

 

· The assignment must be in APA 7th edition format.

·

Due on Sep 8, 2024 11:55 PM

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

2Self-of-the-Therapist ReflectionName of Student Lecturer Name Course Date

2 Self-of-the-Therapist Reflection Name of Student Lecturer Name Course Date Self-of-the-Therapist Reflection Introduction Therapists often, without our knowledge, carry around our own biases influencing how we view and relate to clients. Most often these biases are based on our family of origin, cultural upbringing or old experiences. It is important

Week 6. Assignment. Change Management Change management is an important topic in today’s workforce. Organizations can no longer afford to be

Week 6. Assignment. Change Management Change management is an important topic in today’s workforce. Organizations can no longer afford to be stagnant; therefore, the most successful organizations are constantly reinventing and improving their processes, products, and services to stay competitive in a global marketplace. For most employees, change is difficult.

Chelzea OMotivational Theories and Reducing Turnover Motivation plays a critical role in employee engagement, retention, a

Chelzea O Motivational Theories and Reducing Turnover Motivation plays a critical role in employee engagement, retention, and organizational performance. Two commonly studied motivational theories are Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory and Vroom’s Expectancy Theory. While both provide useful insights into what drives employees, they differ in focus and application. Comparison of Herzberg’s