You have been thinking about your topic for the past several Units. We will now explore some of the essential, initial elements of a good

You have been thinking about your topic for the past several Units. We will now explore some of the
essential, initial elements of a good research paper.

• The first section of your paper you will work on will be your Introduction. This describes the
paper to your reader.

o What is important to include? Any helpful tips from the resources shared this week?
Remember, the thesis statement you previously worked on will be included at the end of
your Introduction.

• Next, you will summarize the articles you included in your Annotated Bibliography into a
Literature Review. This will make up the bulk of your paper.

o Have you written a literature review in the past, and if so, what was your experience in doing
so? If not, what questions do you have? What important tips did you see in this week’s
resources?

• Finally, every research article has a large conclusion section. Sometimes it is called
Results, but it always offers findings and future directions.

o What elements will you be sure to include in your own paper? What questions do you have
about writing a strong conclusion?

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

  Hi All, Dr. Deats, a psychiatrist who interviewed Richard Kuklinski, referred to as the Iceman, utilized the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) an

  Hi All, Dr. Deats, a psychiatrist who interviewed Richard Kuklinski, referred to as the Iceman, utilized the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) and the Psychopathic Personality Inventory-Revised (PPI-R) to measure his psychopathic characteristics. The PCL-R, created by Robert Hare, assesses psychopathy through 20 criteria divided into two primary factors: Interpersonal/Affective and

  The assessment measures that the psychiatrist used seem to be various questions or an interview-style assessment. He asked various questions about

  The assessment measures that the psychiatrist used seem to be various questions or an interview-style assessment. He asked various questions about Richard’s childhood, thoughts, feelings, beliefs, morals, reasons for his crimes, people, family, and children. Richard Kuklinski has various psychopathic traits that the psychiatrist was attempting to fish out.

    Based on the current discussion on assessing reliability, James et al. (1984) discuss approaches to assessing inter-rater agreement (see attached a

    Based on the current discussion on assessing reliability, James et al. (1984) discuss approaches to assessing inter-rater agreement (see attached article). How do their findings inform best practices for improving rater reliability in applied settings? Answering this challenge question “counts” as a discussion respond    rwg James et