Analyze epidemiologic data on morbidity and mortality related to acute and chronic disease states.Individual Preventive Screening

 Analyze epidemiologic data on morbidity and mortality related to acute and chronic disease states.

Individual Preventive Screening

Review the clinician provider guidelines and recommendations from the United States Preventive Services Task Force A and B Recommendations.

For the master’s-prepared nurse, knowledge of epidemiology and its application to preventive screening guidelines is important in many clinical areas: administrative, education, and nurse practitioner fields. Individual patient preventive screenings are ordered as a secondary measure 
before symptoms occur. Preventive screenings are recommended based on outcome data from epidemiological studies, that the test is beneficial; based on risk and characteristics of the identified population in the screening guideline.

Select one screening below from the United States Preventive Services Task Force guidelines.

· Abdominal aortic aneurysm

· Breast cancer

· Cervical cancer

· Colon cancer

· Diabetes mellitus II

· Lung cancer

Condition and Screening

· Define the condition and type of screening

Epidemiology of Condition

· Discuss the epidemiology of the condition in the United States, via three statistical terms. Include the mortality and related morbidity statistics in numerical format and address trends. Include 3 comparisons: related disparities, such as race, sex, age, etc. Clearly state an analysis of the data, identifying gaps and inequities in care. Provide trends and outcomes related to screening benefits in numerical statistics.

Methodology

· Incorporate the described USPSTF guideline development methodology process, (How the guideline was developed).

· Discuss the preventive guideline criteria, the population, and provide details on the screening tool.

· Include detailed risk factors. If there is a risk prediction tool, include this.

Critical Analysis

· Conduct a literature review of the guideline’s support used for its development. You may include alternative studies found in more recent literature supporting or offering alternative views.

· Identify and discuss four studies used in the guideline development clearly relating the impact on the guideline criteria for screening, tool, or population etc.

· Identify each study clearly in the paper and cite.

Summary

Provide a summary conclusion of the screening guideline, general benefit to the individual, and why it is important.

Format expectations:

· Follow all assessment directions.

· Introduction and conclusion are included.

· Information in paragraphs and paper organized to convey the content to the reader.

· Paper length paper should be least 3–4 pages of content.

· Follows APA in paper format, reference page, in-text citations, or headings.

· Uses four or more credible peer-reviewed sources.

Master’s-prepared nurse educators, leaders, nurse practitioners, and all specialty nursing fields are contributors to health promotion in populations across the life span. You will demonstrate understanding and correct interpretations of preventive screening guidelines. You should be able to apply this knowledge to your specialty focus as it relates to health promotion and epidemiology.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

topics:  Sustainable Renewable Energies ,Sustainable Use of Water                 Pick 2 topics about which you learned something new on this course.

topics:  Sustainable Renewable Energies ,Sustainable Use of Water                 Pick 2 topics about which you learned something new on this course.  Write one reflection for each topic using the space provided in the  reflection guide table. You will submit two reflection guides, one for  each topic you decide to write

Page 1 of 5 EDUC6000_Assessment 3_20240603ASSESSMENT 3 BRIEFSubject Code and Title EDUC6000 Becoming a High Achieving Professional

Page 1 of 5 EDUC6000_Assessment 3_20240603 ASSESSMENT 3 BRIEF Subject Code and Title EDUC6000 Becoming a High Achieving Professional Leader Assessment Assessment 3: Reflective Journal Individual/Group Individual Length 1600 words (+/- 10%) Learning Outcomes The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion of the task below include: a) Articulate and

Page 1 of 11 DTE401_Assessment 3_20240603ASSESSMENT 3 BRIEFSubject Code and Title DTE401: Design ThinkingAssessment Folio B – Ideation and

Page 1 of 11 DTE401_Assessment 3_20240603 ASSESSMENT 3 BRIEF Subject Code and Title DTE401: Design Thinking Assessment Folio B – Ideation and Prototyping Individual/Group Individual Length 1500 words equivalent (±10%) Learning Outcomes The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion of the task below include: a) Articulate and apply the