Classroom Activity No. 1:     Due date: 9/24 – 9/26 Essay Requirements:   Child’s first two years in the “Social World.”.Provide a meaningful response to

Classroom Activity No. 1:     Due date: 9/24 – 9/26

Essay Requirements:   Child’s first two years in the “Social World.”.

  1. Provide a meaningful response to the following questions below.
  2. Submit your response in the following format: Word document -double-spaced, Times New Roman (12 font), use page number (bottom of page). Make sure to spell check. Incorporate a conclusion to outline your insights.
  3. Essay length: 200 minimum -1200 maximum words.
  4. Use proper citations and references  (APA format). Your textbook and other peer-reviewed articles are great resources that validate your response.
  5. Submit your essay via email to [email protected] on the assigned due date.

Topic: The Child’s First Two Years  

** In the first two years of life, a child’s social world primarily revolves around developing close bonds with their parents and primary caregivers. Children learn how to express basic emotions through vocalizations and facial expressions. Children experience anxiety and become more interested in interacting with others, often through imitation and simple play behaviors such as smiling and reaching for objects. Therefore, to outline the child’s first two years, could you provide meaningful answers with examples to the following questions?

  1. What are the key milestones in a child’s social development during the first two years:  Newborn through 24 months  (i.e., newborn- 3 months, 3-6 months, 6-9 months, etc.…..?
  1. How do parents support a child’s social growth in the first two years of the toddler’s growth development?
  1. What are the essential aspects of a child’s social education/advancement in the first two years?
  1. How do emotions differ between the first and second years of life? Do you think these emotions create temperamental traits that later affect a child’s personality?
  2. CONCLUSION

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Please write an introduction following the grading rubic below and the thematic grid attached from the listed 5 articles. Grading

Please write an introduction following the grading rubic below and the thematic grid attached from the listed 5 articles. Grading Rubric:                                                                         Poor                                  Excellent Possible Introduction                                                   13.75   16.25   18.75   21.25   23.75   25 Start w/problem statement – why do this?  And lead into a theory – why do we predict the  variables to be related? Theories explain why Review

Please follow the attached literature grid and provide an introduction for the five (5) articles listed below. 1. Bänninger-Huber, E., & Salvenauer, S.

Please follow the attached literature grid and provide an introduction for the five (5) articles listed below. 1. Bänninger-Huber, E., & Salvenauer, S. (2023). Different types of laughter and their function foremotion regulation in dyadic interactions. Current Psychology: A Journal for DiversePerspectives on Diverse Psychological Issues, 42(28), 24249–24259. 2. Cai,

SUBJECT: CHILD PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTIONS: Part 1: Article ReviewRead Bjorklund (2018) A metatheory for cognitive development (or “Piaget is

SUBJECT: CHILD PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTIONS: Part 1: Article ReviewRead Bjorklund (2018) A metatheory for cognitive development (or “Piaget is Dead”Revisited).Introduction: Bjorklund’s paper argues for a new organizational structure for cognitive development. This structure is most compatible with core-knowledge and dynamic-systems theories discussed in chapter 4, but also encompasses major aspects of

SUBJECT: CHILD PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTIONS: Part 1: Article ReviewRead Bjorklund (2018) A metatheory for cognitive development (or “Piaget is

SUBJECT: CHILD PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTIONS: Part 1: Article ReviewRead Bjorklund (2018) A metatheory for cognitive development (or “Piaget is Dead”Revisited).Introduction: Bjorklund’s paper argues for a new organizational structure for cognitive development. This structure is most compatible with core-knowledge and dynamic-systems theories discussed in chapter 4, but also encompasses major aspects of

SUBJECT: CHILD PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTIONS: Part 1: Article ReviewRead Bjorklund (2018) A metatheory for cognitive development (or “Piaget is

SUBJECT: CHILD PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTIONS: Part 1: Article ReviewRead Bjorklund (2018) A metatheory for cognitive development (or “Piaget is Dead”Revisited).Introduction: Bjorklund’s paper argues for a new organizational structure for cognitivedevelopment. This structure is most compatible with core-knowledge and dynamic-systems theories discussed in chapter 4, but also encompasses major aspects ofinformation-processing theories