see attachment Motivation vs. Self-EfficacyInstructions:  Read this week’s course material. Based on

see attachment 

Motivation vs. Self-Efficacy

Instructions: 

Read this week’s course material. Based on the information learned, argue with a paragraph:

· What is more important when performing a complex task: motivation or self-efficacy?

 

Submission Instructions:

· Submit your initial discussion post by 11:59 PM Eastern on Wednesday.  

· Contribute a 
minimum of 200 words for your initial post.

· It should include 
at least 2 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

· Respond, with a 
minimum of 50 words, to at least one of your classmates’ discussion post by 11:59 PM ET on Sunday.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

  Hi All, Dr. Deats, a psychiatrist who interviewed Richard Kuklinski, referred to as the Iceman, utilized the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) an

  Hi All, Dr. Deats, a psychiatrist who interviewed Richard Kuklinski, referred to as the Iceman, utilized the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) and the Psychopathic Personality Inventory-Revised (PPI-R) to measure his psychopathic characteristics. The PCL-R, created by Robert Hare, assesses psychopathy through 20 criteria divided into two primary factors: Interpersonal/Affective and

  The assessment measures that the psychiatrist used seem to be various questions or an interview-style assessment. He asked various questions about

  The assessment measures that the psychiatrist used seem to be various questions or an interview-style assessment. He asked various questions about Richard’s childhood, thoughts, feelings, beliefs, morals, reasons for his crimes, people, family, and children. Richard Kuklinski has various psychopathic traits that the psychiatrist was attempting to fish out.

    Based on the current discussion on assessing reliability, James et al. (1984) discuss approaches to assessing inter-rater agreement (see attached a

    Based on the current discussion on assessing reliability, James et al. (1984) discuss approaches to assessing inter-rater agreement (see attached article). How do their findings inform best practices for improving rater reliability in applied settings? Answering this challenge question “counts” as a discussion respond    rwg James et