In the previous assignment, you developed a position paper for the research topic that you have identified and explored. You have recommendations for

In the previous assignment, you developed a position paper for the research topic that you have identified and explored. You have recommendations for change, revocation, modification, and addition to the research topic. Your research topic has come from an issue, problem, or policy of law enforcement, corrections, or the court system. In this assignment, you will revise your IP 4 draft based on instructor and peer feedback and you will evaluate an alternative position to your  topic selected that was not addressed in your original IP4 draft. 

-First, revise your unit 4 IP bases on instructor feedback and peer responses. 

-Next, add to your final IP4 draft by addressing the following in 4-5 pages: 

Select 1 alternative to your position addresses in the Unit IP4 regarding your selected topic: 

What major points  are argues by proponents of this alternative position? Explain in detail. 

Conduct research on this alternative position and evaluate the arguments. 

-Do the arguments hold any merit? Why/why not? 

– What policies currently exist that support these arguments? Explain in detail. 

-Which position is more significant for improving the current state of the criminal justice system? Explain in detail. 

Remember to use academic and scholarly sources to support your arguments. 

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

n this discussion, you’ll complete your first of three Walk In My Shoes assignments. These learning activities, which will end in your final presentation,

n this discussion, you’ll complete your first of three Walk In My Shoes assignments. These learning activities, which will end in your final presentation, explore corrections through the perspectives of individuals most impacted by these systems. We’ll begin by reading two articles from “Life Inside,” a weekly first-person series written by real

part A (2.3 Discussion: Police Organizations) Why This Discussion? Now that you’ve learned about police organizations, it’s time to apply what you’ve

part A (2.3 Discussion: Police Organizations) Why This Discussion? Now that you’ve learned about police organizations, it’s time to apply what you’ve learned while acting again as the chief of the Atlanta Police Department. Since police chiefs are expected to make evidence-based decisions as police leaders, consider what evidence from the

Description Deliverable Length: 2 pages (matrix may be enclosed in the paper) Complete the following:Using the technique of screening for suitability,

Description Deliverable Length: 2 pages (matrix may be enclosed in the paper) Complete the following: Using the technique of screening for suitability, feasibility, acceptability, distinguishability, completeness, and evaluation criteria, conduct a critical analysis to identify the most practical course of action (COA). Develop a comparison matrix slide that examines the COAs

Description Deliverable Length: 2 pages (matrix may be enclosed in the paper) Complete the following:Using the technique of screening for suitability,

Description Deliverable Length: 2 pages (matrix may be enclosed in the paper) Complete the following: Using the technique of screening for suitability, feasibility, acceptability, distinguishability, completeness, and evaluation criteria, conduct a critical analysis to identify the most practical course of action (COA). Develop a comparison matrix slide that examines the COAs

Discuss the difference between classical, neoclassical, and positivist criminology. Give an example of a crime and explain the crime using each

Discuss the difference between classical, neoclassical, and positivist criminology. Give an example of a crime and explain the crime using each theory. What are the differences between criminal and civil law? Provide examples or scenarios that highlight those differences. Justify your response with supporting material from at least one scholarly academic