see attached
By now, you have had the chance to select a successful team leader that you will interview for this culminating assignment. Your interview does not have to be recorded, but you should take copious notes that you can reference when you write your paper.
Your interview questions must include but are not limited to the following:
· What does your interviewee believe makes a team? How should teams be formed?
· What does your interviewee believe are the elements of building an effective team? What was that process like for them?
· What experience does your interviewee have with establishing team goals? What example can they share with you of what that experience was like? Did the interviewee’s team reach their team goals?
· When your interviewee identified conflict within a team, how do they mitigate it?
· When a decision must be made, how does your interviewee lead their team through that decision-making process?
Draft a summary of your response to that interview in a 4-5page paper in APA 7th format. Make connections between the interview responses and
what you have learned in this course
, supporting your paper with at least 4 academic sources.
According to the request, please simulate an interview to a leader of non-profit organization and finish this assignment, this course is about
Creating and leading an effective team
, the learning outcome is here, it concludes what you have learned in this course: use this clos to Make connections between the interview responses and
what you have learned in this course
,
Course Learning Outcomes (CLOs) | Program Learning Outcomes |
1. Describe how teams are formed and how teams operate. | 1, 2, 3, 5 |
0. Recognize the benefits of a collaborative approach to establishing team goals. | 5, 8 |
0. Create an approach to effectively dealing with team conflict. | 5, 7, 8 |
0. Describe the elements of building an effective team. | 1, 2, 3, 5 |
0. Explain the elements of team decision-making. | 1, 8 |
No AI allowed; turn-it-in similarity must be under 15%
Rubric:
Criteria | Performance Indicators (Observation descriptors indicating extent to which criterion is met.) | ||||
Exemplary 10・9 | Proficient 8・7・6 | Needs Improvement 5・4 | Unsatisfactory 3・2・1 | No Submission | |
Depth 30% of overall grade | Content indicates synthesis of ideas, in depth analysis, and evidence of original thought and support for the topic. | Content indicates original thinking and develops ideas with sufficient and firm evidence. | Content indicates thinking and reasoning applied with original thought on a few ideas. | Content indicates some thinking and reasoning but most ideas are unoriginal or underdeveloped. | 0 points |
Resources 25% of overall grade | All evidence supports arguments and is relevant to the topic. The student uses the required number and type of resources identified in the syllabus to support his/her argument. | Most evidence supports arguments and is relevant to the topic. The student uses 75% of the required number and type of resources identified in the syllabus to support his/her argument. | Some evidence supports arguments and is relevant to the topic. The student uses 50% of the required number of sources. | Limited evidence to support arguments, with few sources relevant to the topic. The student uses less than 50% of the required number of sources. | 0 points |
Organization 15% of overall grade | Paper has a high degree of attention to logic and reasoning of points. Paper clearly leads the reader to the conclusion and stirs thought regarding the topic. | Paper is coherent and logically organized with transitions used between ideas and paragraphs to create coherence. Overall unity of ideas is present. | Paper is somewhat structured and logically organized. Some points remain misplaced and stray from the topic. Transitions evident but not used throughout. | Paper is limited in logical organization with major errors. | 0 points |
Mechanics 15% of overall grade | Few errors in spelling, punctuation, capitalization, sentence structure, and grammar. | Occasional errors in spelling, punctuation, capitalization, sentence structure and grammar, but meaning is not obscured. | Frequent errors of spelling, punctuation, capitalization, sentence structure and grammar; meaning confused or obscured. | Dominated by errors in spelling, punctuation, capitalization, sentence structure and grammar; meaning at times unidentifiable. | 0 points |
Formatting 15% of overall grade | Paper meets all formatting guidelines and assignment requirements, including page-length and APA formatting requirements. Paper is correctly assembled with a professional look. | The paper follows most formatting guidelines, including page-length and APA formatting requirements.Paper is correctly assembled. | Paper generally follows formatting guidelines and assignment requirements, including page-length and APA formatting requirements. Paper has some assembly errors | Paper does not follow formatting guidelines and assignment requirements, including page -length and APA format requirements. Paper has major assembly errors | 0 points |
