Module 4, Week 6 | Quantitative Research Critical Appraisal 2 AssignmentName __________________________________ Step 1: Read

Module 4, Week 6 | Quantitative Research Critical Appraisal 2 Assignment

Name __________________________________

Step 1: Read the
abstract and the
methods sections of:

· Swenson, S., et al. (2016) Parents’ use of praise and criticism in a sample of young children seeking mental health services.
Journal of Pediatric Health Care, 30, 49-56.

· Wilson, R. et al. (2016). A randomized controlled trial of an individualized preoperative education intervention for symptom management after total knee arthroplasty.
Orthopaedic Nursing, 35(1)

Step 2: Read Chapters 8, 9, 13, and 14 of your textbook.

Step 3: Complete the table below and upload it through the assignment tab. Please be sure to view and understand the associated rubric for this assignment. Include rationales for each of your answers to demonstrate concept mastery.

Questions

Swenson et al.

Wilson et al.

Research Design

Was the design experimental, quasi-experimental, or nonexperimental? What was the specific design used?

If there was an intervention, were the intervention and the control conditions adequately described?

If the study was nonexperimental, why did the researcher opt not to intervene?

What are the major limitations of the design used?

Sampling Plan

Was the population identified? Were eligibility criteria specified?

What type of sampling plan was used?

How many participants were in the sample? What was the attrition rate?

Were key characteristics of the sample described?

Data Collection

Did the report provide adequate information about data collection procedures?

Did the report offer reliability measures for the instruments used? Was reliability acceptable?

Did the report offer validity of the instrument?

If there was no reliability or validity information, what conclusion can you draw about the study?

Appraising Statistical Analysis

Did the descriptive statistics sufficiently describe the major variables and background characteristics of the sample?

Did the researchers report inferential statistics? What were they?

Were any multivariate procedures used? What were they?

What were the significant results? How does this support or not support the hypothesis?

Based on both appraisals, which report do you find more valuable? Provide rationale.

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Bb week 6 soapSOAP Note _______ NU___:_________ Herzing University

Bb week 6 soap SOAP Note _______ NU___:_________ Herzing University Name:_________________________ Typhon Encounter #: _____________________ Comprehensive:____Focused:____ S: SUBJECTIVE DATA CC: What are they being seen for? This is the reason that the patient sought care, stated in their own words/words of their caregiver, or paraphrased. HPI: Use the “OLDCART” approach

BM week 6 soapSOAP Note _______ NU___:_________ Herzing University

BM week 6 soap SOAP Note _______ NU___:_________ Herzing University Name:_________________________ Typhon Encounter #: _____________________ Comprehensive:____Focused:____ S: SUBJECTIVE DATA CC: What are they being seen for? This is the reason that the patient sought care, stated in their own words/words of their caregiver, or paraphrased. HPI: Use the “OLDCART” approach

roch week 6 soapSOAP Note _______ NU___:_________ Herzing University

roch week 6 soap SOAP Note _______ NU___:_________ Herzing University Name:_________________________ Typhon Encounter #: _____________________ Comprehensive:____Focused:____ S: SUBJECTIVE DATA CC: What are they being seen for? This is the reason that the patient sought care, stated in their own words/words of their caregiver, or paraphrased. HPI: Use the “OLDCART” approach

Mitz week 6 soap SOAP Note _______ NU___:_________ Herzing University

Mitz week 6 soap  SOAP Note _______ NU___:_________ Herzing University Name:_________________________ Typhon Encounter #: _____________________ Comprehensive:____Focused:____ S: SUBJECTIVE DATA CC: What are they being seen for? This is the reason that the patient sought care, stated in their own words/words of their caregiver, or paraphrased. HPI: Use the “OLDCART” approach

  For this week’s discussion, you will take a closer look at findings from your population health assessment & prevention project.   Identify the

  For this week’s discussion, you will take a closer look at findings from your population health assessment & prevention project.    Identify the role of your collaborating healthcare professional and share a needed change the two of you identified in your assessment.   Identify a community stakeholder or policy maker that could support the recommended change. What resources might be needed?  Provide a paragraph