SEE ATTACHEDTCOB Graduate Studies Discussion RubricCriteria No Submission 0 pointsNovice (Criterion is missing or notin evidence) 1-13

SEE ATTACHED

TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric

Criteria No Submission

0 points

Novice
(Criterion is missing or not

in evidence)
1-13 points

Basic
(works towards meeting

expectations;
performance needs

improvement)
14-16 points

Proficient
(meets expectations;

performance is satisfactory)
17-18 points

Exemplary
(exceeds expectations;

performance is outstanding)
19-20 points

Support of
Week’s Reading

No Student
Submission
(0 points)

Does not refer to the
readings to support postings

(1-13 points)

Alludes to the readings
to support postings

(14-16 points)

Refers to examples from the
readings to support postings

(17-18 points)

Provides concrete examples from
the readings to support postings;

integrates prior readings in
postings

(19-20 points)

Observations No Student
Submission
(0 points)

Does not integrate personal
observations or knowledge;

does not present new
observations
(1-13 points)

Integrates personal
observations and

knowledge in a cursory
manner; does not

present new
observations

(14-16 points)

Integrates personal
observations and knowledge
in an accurate way; presents

new observations
(17-18 points)

Integrates personal observations
and knowledge in an accurate and

highly insightful way; presents
new observations

(19-20 points)

Response to
Classmates

No Student
Submission

(0 points)

Responds in a cursory
manner to classmates’

postings
(1-13 points)

Constructively responds
to classmates’ postings

(14-16 points)

Constructively responds to
classmates’ postings; offers

insight that encourages other
students to think critically

about their own work.
(17-18 points)

Constructively responds to
classmates’ postings; masterfully
connects the material presented
in classmates’ postings to their

responses; encourages classmates
to think critically about their own

work.
(19-20 points)

Organization,
Word Choice,
and Sentence

Structure

No Student
Submission

(0 points)

Posts are disorganized and
information is not presented
in a logical sequence; word

choice and sentence
structure are not suitable

(1-13 points)

Posts are somewhat
disorganized, and
information is not

presented in a logical
sequence; word choice
and sentence structure

are not suitable
(14-16 points)

Posts are organized, and
information is presented in a

logical sequence; word
choice and sentence

structure are suitable; there
are a few errors; however,

errors do not affect
readability.

(17-18 points)

Posts are organized and
information is presented in a

logical sequence; word choice and
sentence structure are suitable;

no errors in the response.
(19-20 points)

References No Student
Submission

(0 points)

Includes no sources to
support conclusions

(1-13 points)

Includes 1 outside
source to support and
enrich the discussion;

Includes 2 or more outside
sources to support and
enrich the discussion;

sources are properly cited in

Includes 2 or more outside
sources to support and enrich the
discussion; sources are cited using

APA format; style guidelines are

TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric

sources are not properly
cited in APA format

(14-16 points)

APA format and are properly
integrated into the discussion

response
(17-18 points)

masterfully integrated into the
discussion response.

(19-20 points)

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Explain which HRIS types your current or previous employer utilizes. If your current or previous organization does not utilize an HRIS, which types

Explain which HRIS types your current or previous employer utilizes. If your current or previous organization does not utilize an HRIS, which types would you recommend? How does the utilization of those systems promote transformational HR activities? Discuss the differences between Two-Tier (Client-Server), Three-Tier, and N-Tier architectures. In your opinion,

Stacy McAllister  Addressing Negativity in Staff Meetings: A Leadership PerspectiveAs the senior leader of an organization, it is crucial to address

Stacy McAllister  Addressing Negativity in Staff Meetings: A Leadership Perspective As the senior leader of an organization, it is crucial to address negativity promptly to maintain a productive and positive work environment. Barrett (2014) emphasizes the importance of immediately addressing negativity to prevent it from affecting team dynamics and performance.

Staffing AnalysisInterest

Staffing Analysis Interest Rate Applications 4.0% 3098 4.3% 2785 4.3% 2515 4.7% 2180 4.7% 1873 5.2% 1794 5.6% 1450 5.7% 1177 6.1% 822 6.2% 886 6.2% 740 6.8% 740 7.1% 722 7.6% 540 8.3% 375 8.9% 425 9.4% 360 9.5% 389 9.7% 339 9.8% 336