follow all directionsWeek 3 discussion: the Context of a CrisisIn some cultures, eye contact is a sign of respect while

follow all directions

Week 3 discussion: the Context of a Crisis

In some cultures, eye contact is a sign of respect while lack of eye contact is a sign of avoidance, mistrust, or that a person hiding something. In other cultures, eye contact can be interpreted as a sign of defiance, while avoiding eye contact is a sign of deference. If you were to misinterpret eye contact as an HSPP, you may misinterpret the body language of a service user in a way that can be detrimental to your work with them. This is just one example of how culture can affect how service users access resources in a time of crisis or trauma. You will undoubtedly be working with people of different cultures and it is necessary to be aware of how culture shapes services users’ responses as well as how your culture shapes your own perceptions.

Culture is a factor that can add context to a crisis and affect how service users and HSPPs respond to a critical incident. There are other factors you need to be aware of, such as ecological factors (this refers to things such as age, socioeconomic status, and physical health) that can affect how services users and HSPPs interact. In this discussion, you will examine how the contexts of culture and ecological factors affect the survivor’s response to a critical incident.

  

To Prepare

· Review the Learning Resources and Course Announcements.

· Consider how peoples’ cultures can affect their responses to a crisis.

· Consider how ecological factors can affect how an individual responds to a crisis.

Post the following:

· Provide a brief description of a crisis or critical incident that you select.

· Explain how you would respond to this crisis in 2 different cultural contexts.

· Identify at least 3 ecological factors such as age, ethnicity, environment, and social economic status that may affect the survivors’ response to the critical incident.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

  This week’s discussion is a two folds discussion. First, explain the role of the Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner as it relates to the

  This week’s discussion is a two folds discussion. First, explain the role of the Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner as it relates to the scope of psychotherapy. Second, explain how this week’s discussion aligns with the following APNA standard: Standard 5G: Therapeutic Relationship: Psychiatric-mental health registered nurse uses therapeutic relationship

  This week’s discussion is a two folds discussion. First, explain the role of the Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner as it relates to the

  This week’s discussion is a two folds discussion. First, explain the role of the Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner as it relates to the scope of psychotherapy. Second, explain how this week’s discussion aligns with the following APNA standard: Standard 5G: Therapeutic Relationship: Psychiatric-mental health registered nurse uses therapeutic relationship

  This week’s discussion is a two folds discussion. First, explain the role of the Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner as it relates to the

  This week’s discussion is a two folds discussion. First, explain the role of the Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner as it relates to the scope of psychotherapy. Second, explain how this week’s discussion aligns with the following APNA standard: Standard 5G: Therapeutic Relationship: Psychiatric-mental health registered nurse uses therapeutic relationship

#1 An action item that resonated with my role as a clinical nurse coordinator is the ability to enhance quantitative reasoning. It is important to show

#1 An action item that resonated with my role as a clinical nurse coordinator is the ability to enhance quantitative reasoning. It is important to show that “the most successful population health initiatives have demonstrated their effectiveness through distinctive quality improvement methods that combine thinking about assessment, outcomes, and costs