Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

Philosophy

Write a two to three-page paper (not including cover and reference pages) that responds to the following prompt: You are getting settled into your seat for

December 9, 2024

Write a two to three-page paper (not including cover and reference pages) that responds to the following prompt:

You are getting settled into your seat for a very long plane ride home. As you get to know the person next to you, you learn that they are a devout atheist who believes that God is a myth that people have invented to make them feel better. After listening carefully to why this person does not believe in God, you have an opportunity to explain why you do believe in God. What would you say? In your response, you may share your personal story or testimony of faith (although not required), but you must share some objective evidence to support your faith in God and back up this evidence with solid, academic sources.Incorporate at least four references from the reading assignments, supplementary reading material, class lectures, and personal observations into your paper. Use APA formatting and be sure to properly source and cite all references.

Why do you believe God exists? What are your logic-based reasons? If your personal testimony never occurred, or before your personal experience happened, were there logical reasons to believe in the existence of God? Your paper should explain why is it more logical to believe in theism (“God exists”) rather than in atheism (“God does not exist”). Select one argument (and only one argument) for the existence of God, and then provide a depth of analysis on that single argument. The following list provides popular arguments for the existence of God:

Video: The Argument from Design: The Fine-Tuning of the Universe
Website: The First Cause Argument
Website: The Argument from Conscience
Website: The Argument from Morality
Website: The Argument from Desire

To defend and analyze an argument means to answer Yes to these questions and give an explanation: Are the key terms clear? Are the premises true? Is the conclusion logical? Logical thinking skills must be demonstrated in contrast to merely sharing stories, experiences, or emotions. The vast majority of the paper should primarily focus on presenting an argument for the existence of God, rather than focus on responding to objections against the existence of God. Again, present with depth a logical argument and then defend it.

You must share some objective evidence to support your belief in God’s existence, and back up this objective evidence with solid, academic sources. Objective evidence means logic and data. For this philosophy course, the paper should not try and prove the validity nor historicity of the Bible, but instead, present the philosophical logic for the existence of God. After the first half-page, the paper should not (a) share personal testimonies, or (b) share subjective experiences, or (c) merely quote the Bible as supernatural revelation, which an atheist would not consider authoritative.

Note: This is a dialogue. Write as if you are having the conversation with this person. It might be hard to fully write a complete back-and-forth of every part of the exchange, but make sure to include how you would present your personal experience and your rational arguments for God’s existence. This paper is intentionally moving you toward a personal formulation of your worldview and preparing you to write your final worldview paper for this class.

Philosophy

Share This Post

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Part 3 is when you will begin drafting and giving each other feedback on your Final Projects. By now, you should have plenty of resources, pros and cons

Part 3 is when you will begin drafting and giving each other feedback on your Final Projects. By now, you should have plenty of resources, pros and cons for the different arguments related to your topic, you have reviewed and hopefully connected with one or more real-world solutions to your

Attached is the lecture attached are 2 questions that require answered.

do this assignment for me ,its for my philosophy ethics class

Write and post a 400-500 word focused argument about the reading. You should establish your point from the beginning (i.e., in the first sentence) and

Write and post a 400-500 word focused argument about the reading. You should establish your point from the beginning (i.e., in the first sentence) and support your claims with textual evidence. Your post can: Draw a comparison between something in the text to something today by arguing that the element in the

Please watch the videos first, then complete the Data, Calculations, and Construction of Orbit sections before answering the six questions and writing

Please watch the videos first, then complete the Data, Calculations, and Construction of Orbit sections before answering the six questions and writing the conclusion. I have also sent a worksheet where the work needs to be done. Finally, please provide the completed worksheets in PDF format.

Your submission should be at least two pages in length, not counting the title page and references (if used). References: No outside sources are

Your submission should be at least two pages in length, not counting the title page and references (if used). References: No outside sources are required for the assignment. Details: This assignment has two parts. Both parts will be completed in the same attached Unit VII Homework Template. Part 1: Choose one of the three

The purpose of this assignment is toapply what you’ve learned about interpretive analysis and the visual arts by writing a reasonable and

The purpose of this assignment is to apply what you’ve learned about interpretive analysis and the visual arts by writing a reasonable and convincing INTERPRETIVE ANALYSIS of a work of visual art, practice using form and content evidence to support your reasonable and convincing interpretation by integrating the descriptions you wrote for a painting from

You will write a 1000-1500 word response to your chosen paper topic from the list below. See Course Outline for the due date. This assignment is worth

You will write a 1000-1500 word response to your chosen paper topic from the list below. See Course Outline for the due date. This assignment is worth 300 points, or 30% of your grade. DO NOT USE ANY SOURCES OTHER THAN THE DALRYMPLE ARTICLE AND YOUR TEXTBOOK, WHICH YOU WILL CITE USING MLA

You will write a 1000-1500 word response to your chosen paper topic from the list below. See Course Outline for the due date. DO NOT USE ANY SOURCES

You will write a 1000-1500 word response to your chosen paper topic from the list below. See Course Outline for the due date. DO NOT USE ANY SOURCES OTHER THAN THE DALRYMPLE ARTICLE AND YOUR TEXTBOOK, WHICH YOU WILL CITE USING MLA FORMAT. YOU WILL ATTACH A FILE IN THE BOX AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS

Length: Your submission should be at least two (2) pages in length, not including the title page and references (if used). References: APA Style will not

Length: Your submission should be at least two (2) pages in length, not including the title page and references (if used). References: APA Style will not be required for this assignment, and no outside resources are required. Details: Using the Unit III Assignment Template, write a dialogue (short conversation) between two people. Keys to

SHEILA- UP TO 3/2/2025- *** PLEASE MAKE SURE THAT ALL WORK IS AUTHENTIC- DO NOT USE AI IT WILL BE SCANNED* **** THIS ASSIGNMENT HAS 3 PARTS /

SHEILA- UP TO 3/2/2025- ***** PLEASE MAKE SURE THAT ALL WORK IS AUTHENTIC- DO NOT USE AI IT WILL BE SCANNED***** ****** THIS ASSIGNMENT HAS 3 PARTS / PLEASE LABEL EACH PART SEPARATELY WITH REFERENCES WHEN COMPLETED****** PART 1- Module 7 – DISCUSSION 7 Philosophy for Your Posterity If you

Connecting standards to content is already a vital component of instruction. Building on this, we will further our expertise through the integration of

Connecting standards to content is already a vital component of instruction. Building on this, we will further our expertise through the integration of critical thinking, reflection and metacognition, and provisions for equity in instruction. Choose 1 content standard that develops and promotes critical thinking. Write a minimum 525-word essay in

Click this link to watch the 2012 Cracknell production of Ibsen’s A Doll’s House.

Click this link to watch the 2012 Cracknell production of Ibsen’s A Doll’s House. https://edu.digitaltheatreplus.com/content/productions/a-dolls-house-digital-theatreTo log in, click the blue “sign on” button enter the following: email/user: spcollege and password: GoTitans1927 GO OVER QUESTIONS AND GRADING CRITERIA BEFORE WATCHING THE FILM! Grading Criteria All your answers must be in your own words, accurately reflect

The clips to answer the questions is at the end of the instructions. The purpose of this assignment is…to cultivate your attention to detail through

The clips to answer the questions is at the end of the instructions. The purpose of this assignment is… to cultivate your attention to detail through the skill of careful watching. to practice using the theater arts vocabulary that you’ve learned from the readings to describe and analyze a work theatrical performance Grading Criteria

Be sure you complete all SIX steps of the assignment. Grading Criteria This is an informal assignment. You are practicing using the terms and

Be sure you complete all SIX steps of the assignment. Grading Criteria This is an informal assignment. You are practicing using the terms and paying attention to detail. All responses must be in your own words, must demonstrate your ability to correctly use the formal art vocabulary you learned in the module,

This assignment will be completed based off an assignment I did last week I’ve attached a photo of my work from the assignment and also the poem I did

This assignment will be completed based off an assignment I did last week I’ve attached a photo of my work from the assignment and also the poem I did the assignment based off of you will need to read both the assignment that I completed and the poem to complete

SHEILA- UP TO 2/2/2025- *** PLEASE MAKE SURE THAT ALL WORK IS AUTHENTIC- DO NOT USE AI IT WILL BE SCANNED* **** THIS ASSIGNMENT HAS 2 PARTS /

SHEILA- UP TO 2/2/2025- ***** PLEASE MAKE SURE THAT ALL WORK IS AUTHENTIC- DO NOT USE AI IT WILL BE SCANNED***** ****** THIS ASSIGNMENT HAS 2 PARTS / PLEASE LABEL EACH PART SEPARATELY WITH REFERENCES WHEN COMPLETED****** PART 1- Module 3 – DISCUSSION 3 State which of the 3 scientific

Grading Criteria Student name and date must be on paper or word document Annotations must be handwritten Or can use draw tools in word All annotation

Grading Criteria Student name and date must be on paper or word document Annotations must be handwritten Or can use draw tools in word All annotations and responses to the annotation questions must be in your own words, demonstrate your ability to correctly use and apply the module concepts, and