NSG 468: Influencing Quality Within HealthcareWk 2 – Healthcare Accreditation


NSG 468: Influencing Quality Within Healthcare

Wk 2 – Healthcare Accreditation

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

Practice – Healthcare Accreditation

Healthcare systems and patients benefit from accreditation standards. Many accrediting bodies are represented in various practice settings. This activity is designed to expose you to some of the major aspects of accreditation and see how it affects quality and safety.

Explore 
The Joint Commission and the 
Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities (CARF) websites to understand what standards these accreditors require participants to meet. Consider:

· History and original purpose for creation

· Purpose for existence now—how has it evolved?

· Where the requirements for each agency are publicly reported

· Why public reporting of metrics is important

· How each body operates

Although we focused on CARF and The Joint Commission in this activity, there are many other accrediting bodies to consider:

· Accreditation Association for Ambulatory Health Care (AAAHC)

· Accreditation Commission for Health Care, Inc. (ACHC)

· American Association for Accreditation of Ambulatory Surgery Facilities (AAAASF)

· American Osteopathic Association Healthcare Facilities Accreditation Program (AOA/HFAP)

· Center for Improvement in Healthcare Quality (CIHQ)

· Community Health Accreditation Program (CHAP)

· Det Norske Veritas Healthcare (DNV Healthcare)

Review the prompts above and summarize your notes in 525 words for future reference.

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

**Include 3 references that are from past 5 years – APA 7th edition

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

***CASE STUDIES ATTACHED*** You should respond to both discussions separately–with constructive literature material- extending, refuting/correcting, or

***CASE STUDIES ATTACHED*** You should respond to both discussions separately–with constructive literature material- extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts.  Minimum 150 words each reply with references under each reply.  Incorporate a minimum of 2 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal