NSG 498: Senior Leadership PracticumWk 2 Summative Assessment: Clinical Judgement Define the


NSG 498: Senior Leadership Practicum

Wk 2 Summative Assessment: Clinical Judgement Define the Problem Presentation

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

Exam Content

You have been talking with your team and interacting with patients. You see some patterns that you would like to change to improve quality. Your team is motivated to help.

This week you will identify the focus of your project and anticipate the ethical, legal, and regulatory concerns that may arise in your career as a nursing leader.

For this summative assessment, create a presentation that communicates the focus and scope of your project. You may select from multiple venues to explain the details of your plan. You will demonstrate problem-solving skills as you organize the details of your plan.

Review
Appendix B – Question Development Tool from Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice: Model and Guidelines.

Begin your plan with the following:

· Define the problem.

· Identify the problem to be addressed and the setting in which it occurs.

· Outline your proposal to address the problem.

· Identify and discuss ethical, legal, and regulatory concerns relating to the problem.

· Explain why you chose the problem.

Support your plan by gathering as much information about your selected problem as possible. Consider both qualitative and quantitative data. For example:

· Leader and peer interviews

· Patient/customer surveys

· Quality improvement (QI) reports from the facility

· Benchmarking studies/baseline data.

· If baseline data is available:

· What are the goals?

· Are current practices meeting the organizational goals?

· Are the prescribed practices followed?

Format your assignment in 1,600-word paper

**Include 3 references that are from past 5 years – APA 7th edition

Bottom of Form

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

***CASE STUDIES ATTACHED*** You should respond to both discussions separately–with constructive literature material- extending, refuting/correcting, or

***CASE STUDIES ATTACHED*** You should respond to both discussions separately–with constructive literature material- extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts.  Minimum 150 words each reply with references under each reply.  Incorporate a minimum of 2 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal

Module 6 Discussion    Health Care Disparities in LGBTQ  Discuss how

Module 6 Discussion     Health Care Disparities in LGBTQ   Discuss how to close the health care disparities gap in the LGBTQ community? Submission Instructions: · Your initial post must be at least 500 words, formatted, and cited in current APA style with support from at least two academic