NRNP_6665_Week9_Assignment_Rubric |
Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIn 2–3 pages, address the following:• Explain the controversy that surrounds dissociative disorders. |
15 to >13.0 pts
Excellent The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders. |
13 to >11.0 pts
Good The response includes an accurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders. |
11 to >10.0 pts
Fair The response includes a somewhat vague or inaccurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders. |
10 to >0 pts
Poor The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders. Or the response is missing. |
| 15 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome• Explain your professional beliefs about dissociative disorders, supporting your rationale with at least three scholarly references from the literature. |
25 to >22.0 pts
Excellent The response includes a thorough and well-organized explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale demonstrates critical thinking and is strongly supported with three scholarly references. |
22 to >19.0 pts
Good The response includes a well-organized explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale is clear and appropriately supported with three scholarly references. |
19 to >17.0 pts
Fair The response includes a somewhat vague explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale is somewhat unclear and references either provide weak support for the rationale or are not scholarly/current. |
17 to >0 pts
Poor The response includes a vague explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale is unclear and references are inappropriate. Or the response is missing. |
| 25 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome• Explain strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder. |
30 to >26.0 pts
Excellent The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder. |
26 to >23.0 pts
Good The response includes an accurate explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder. |
23 to >20.0 pts
Fair The response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder. |
20 to >0 pts
Poor The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder. Or the response is missing. |
| 30 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome• Finally, explain ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that you need to bring to your practice and why they are important. |
15 to >13.0 pts
Excellent The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. |
13 to >11.0 pts
Good The response includes an accurate explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. |
11 to >10.0 pts
Fair The response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. |
10 to >0 pts
Poor The response includes a vague and inaccurate explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. Or, response is missing. |
| 15 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria. |
5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria. |
4 to >3.5 pts
Good Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet they are brief and not descriptive. |
3.5 to >3.0 pts
Fair Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic. |
3 to >0 pts
Poor Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided. |
| 5 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation |
5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors |
4 to >3.5 pts
Good Contains one or two grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors |
3.5 to >3.0 pts
Fair Contains three or four grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors |
3 to >0 pts
Poor Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding |
| 5 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. |
5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent Uses correct APA format with no errors |
4 to >3.5 pts
Good Contains one or two APA format errors |
3.5 to >3.0 pts
Fair Contains three or four APA format errors |
3 to >0 pts
Poor Contains many (five or more) APA format errors |
| 5 pts |
Total Points: 100 |
