Please following the desperation below an don’t use AI pleaseSelect ANY unpublished or published primary source relating to military or

Please following the desperation below an don’t use AI please

Select ANY unpublished or published primary source relating to military or diplomatic history. Please verify with instructor that the document you have chosen meets these criteria. You goal is to establish the PROVENANCE of the primary source to the best of your ability and evaluate the 6 utility of the primary source as a piece of historical evidence. To accomplish this, write an approximately 4–5-page paper (excluding appended primary source) addressing each of the following elements. Write a succinct 1-3 paragraph synopsis of each of the following elements of the source’s PROVENANCE. YOU MUST APPEND A COPY OF THE PRIMARY SOURCE DOCUMENT TO YOUR SOURCE ANALYSIS. 1. WHO. Who authored the document? Was it an individual, if so, who? If collectively written, who wrote it together? Identify the author to the best of your ability and provide as much pertinent information about the author that will help shed light on why they might have written the document. If this is a published primary source, additionally answer WHO published it? How does who published it impact what is being said or how it is being presented in publication? 2. WHAT? What is the document? What kind of document is it? What is/are the author(s) trying to say? 3. WHY? Why do you think the author(s) wrote the document and/or why do you think the publisher published it (if a published primary source). 4. WHEN? When was the document written and/or published? These may not be the same dates. Why is knowing when this document was written and/or published important in helping to understand what it is saying? 5. WHERE? Where was the document written? If published primary source, where was it published? How might where it was written and where it was published impact its message? 6. UTILITY? What value does this document have as historical evidence? Can it be taken entirely at face value? Does it have bias? If so, what is this bias and how can you adjust for this bias? What is its utility and its limitations? How could you use it as historical evidence? How, when, and where might you not want to or be able to use it

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

please see attachedProvide a summary of  just two of any of the

please see attached Provide a summary of  just two of any of the four videos.  You choose which two videos to write about.  In addition to a basic summary of the content of your two chosen videos, you are encouraged to include any facts or parts of the videos that stood

please see attachedRead from chapters 1, 2, and 3 of the  textbookLinks to an

please see attached Read from chapters 1, 2, and 3 of the  textbookLinks to an external site. . Answer five of the following questions.  You choose which five to answer.  Length, citations, attachments: Each answer should be 2 substantial paragraphs in length.  Aim for 250-300 words per answer.  Each answer should contain

Discussion #3: WHO WERE THE “OLD” IMMIGRANTS (INCLUDES: The Original Immigrants from 16th-18th centuries and Immigrants through the

Discussion #3: WHO WERE THE “OLD” IMMIGRANTS (INCLUDES: The Original Immigrants from 16th-18th centuries and Immigrants through the Mid-19th century) Discussion #3 Establish The Baseline of Ethnic Groups in the NORTH AMERICAN BRITISH/FRENCH/SPANISH COLONIES that became the United States After the “American” Revolution AND After the Formation of the US Government