Please see the attached, You have already completed Part 1 DBFA 605Advocacy Project Assignment Instructions

Please see the attached, You have already completed Part 1 

DBFA 605

Advocacy Project Assignment Instructions

Overview

For this assignment, you will draw on your studies to produce an advocacy plan for the issue featured in the
Persuasive Essay and using the communicative mode of your choice. The issue in the
Persuasive Essay will be used to create a local advocacy project. After giving some thought to any specific action plan(s) to be encouraged, the other key part of this assignment is to choose an appropriate
mode for how this advocacy might work (e.g., oral, written, visual, digital, live, online, recorded, etc.).

You will be given an opportunity to justify your choice of mode, so the choice itself needs to be a rhetorically sound, deliberate, and based on the conditions under which the desired audience will encounter the advocacy piece. Examples include a short video, a speech/public talk of some sort, a podcast, a brief written appeal to be placed in an appropriate venue, a visual flyer or poster, some sort of flash performance, etc.

Instructions

The aims of this assignment are twofold: 1) to demonstrate an awareness of what constitutes effective advocacy (e.g., its differences from persuasion), and 2) to show a strong awareness of the rhetorical benefits of different modes of communication, as well as their weaknesses.


Part 1

Topic and Mode Rationale: You will submit a topic with a 200-word rationale for the mode of choice (with at least 3 cited sources) detailing why the issue is relevant to public policy and the mode of choice is being chosen.


Part 2

Outline: You will submit an outline for the project and include at least 5 sources:

a. Setting your goals

b. Strategies for developing your message

c. Strategies to get the message out

d. Team building

e. Putting it all together

f. Conclusion


Part 3

Final: The
Advocacy Project is to be submitted along with a detailed summary of the project; this is at least 6–7 pages in length. The
Advocacy Project must include the following:

1.
Introduction: Must include a summary of the issues and a clear thesis statement

2.
Rationale for the mode of choice: This must include the rationale for the mode of choice detailing why the issue is relevant to public policy.

3.
Include the elements of your outline headings: Each heading must be supported with research, facts, strategies, etc.

a. Setting your goals

b. Strategies for developing your message

c. Strategies to get the message out

d. Team building

e. Putting it all together

4.
Conclusion: offers a good summary of issues treated in the paper and offers practical application.

5.
References

Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

Page 2 of 2

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

  Hi All, Dr. Deats, a psychiatrist who interviewed Richard Kuklinski, referred to as the Iceman, utilized the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) an

  Hi All, Dr. Deats, a psychiatrist who interviewed Richard Kuklinski, referred to as the Iceman, utilized the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) and the Psychopathic Personality Inventory-Revised (PPI-R) to measure his psychopathic characteristics. The PCL-R, created by Robert Hare, assesses psychopathy through 20 criteria divided into two primary factors: Interpersonal/Affective and

  The assessment measures that the psychiatrist used seem to be various questions or an interview-style assessment. He asked various questions about

  The assessment measures that the psychiatrist used seem to be various questions or an interview-style assessment. He asked various questions about Richard’s childhood, thoughts, feelings, beliefs, morals, reasons for his crimes, people, family, and children. Richard Kuklinski has various psychopathic traits that the psychiatrist was attempting to fish out.

    Based on the current discussion on assessing reliability, James et al. (1984) discuss approaches to assessing inter-rater agreement (see attached a

    Based on the current discussion on assessing reliability, James et al. (1984) discuss approaches to assessing inter-rater agreement (see attached article). How do their findings inform best practices for improving rater reliability in applied settings? Answering this challenge question “counts” as a discussion respond    rwg James et