please see attachmentENG 106: Composition II Learning Unit 4: InstructionsPeer Review: Informative Outline InstructionsAuthor:

please see attachment

ENG 106: Composition II Learning Unit 4: Instructions

Peer Review: Informative Outline Instructions

Author: _______________________ Reviewer: _______________________

1. Is the thesis statement clear, specific, and neutral? Does the thesis present at least two legitimate

sides to the debate? List any suggestions below.

2. Major Points in Arguments Side 1 Section:

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

3. How could the first argument section be improved?

4. Main Points in Arguments Side 2 Section:

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

5. How could the second argument section be improved?

6. Does the debate seem balanced? In other words, does the student writer seem to take an objective

stance and present an equal treatment of all arguments involved?

7. What are the three top suggestions you have for improving this outline?

1.

2.

3.

© Kameo Cragoe and Indian Hills Community College

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Class Discussion – Week 2Before thinking about into conflict resolution, it is essential to conduct a conflict analysis. In Chapter 2 of

Class Discussion – Week 2 Before thinking about into conflict resolution, it is essential to conduct a conflict analysis. In Chapter 2 of “Constructive Conflicts,” Kriesberg explores the origins of social conflicts, presenting various theoretical explanations. The chapter introduces several fundamental theoretical ideas. Please relate any of these ideas for