please view attachmentDiscussion 11: Outcome and Impact Evaluations, Part II In this module, we continued our exploration of outcome and impact

please view attachment

Discussion 11: Outcome and Impact Evaluations, Part II

In this module, we continued our exploration of outcome and impact evaluations with three excellent examples from the literature. First, Petrosino and colleagues (2000) published a fascinating piece outlining how and why resistance to evaluation tends to manifest among CJ practitioners; their findings with respect to the Scared Straight program are astonishing. Second, Olver and colleagues (2009) examined outcomes from an inpatient sex offender treatment program, with results that might surprise many. And finally, Hartley and Baldwin (2019) offer a model impact evaluation based on a state-of-the-art veteran’s treatment court program.

In this week’s discussion, the second of two on outcome/impact evaluations. reflect on the work from Mears as well as the three supplements, and address this question: What steps can be taken to increase the number and quality of impact evaluations of criminal justice policies? How would you try to bridge the divide between researchers and practitioners described by Petrosino et al.? What are the ethical responsibilities for researchers and practitioners when findings show that a program is effective? Use examples to help make your points.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

1. criminal justice and criminology research, ensuring the validity of experimental findings is crucial for producing reliable and generalizable

1. criminal justice and criminology research, ensuring the validity of experimental findings is crucial for producing reliable and generalizable results. Internal validity refers to the extent to which a study can demonstrate a causal relationship between variables, while external validity pertains to the generalizability of the findings to broader populations

1. The question of whether Administrative Law Judges should be appointed for life, similar to U.S. District Court judges, involves balancing

1. The question of whether Administrative Law Judges should be appointed for life, similar to U.S. District Court judges, involves balancing judicial independence, accountability, expertise, and flexibility in government administration. ALJs play a crucial role in adjudicating disputes involving federal agencies, and their decisions can significantly impact regulatory enforcement and