Use the Impact Assessment dataset (click here or see below). We’re going to do some data drills involving hypothetical situations where a crime analyst

Use the Impact Assessment dataset (click here or see below). We’re going to do some data drills involving hypothetical situations where a crime analyst would be asked to analyze temporal trends in data to see if the evidence is consistent with an argument that a crime reduction intervention was successful. You don’t need to do any outside research, but you should communicate the results clearly and accurately in text, table, and graphic form.Be sure to calculate (at least) frequency, percent, and percent change. For each question, use these questions to guide and focus your analysis and presentation:

  • What would we need to see to conclude that the evidence is consistent with this claim?
  • When we analyze the data, what do we see?
  • What do we conclude based on our results?

1. In January 2008, Fairfax County, Virginia implemented a new community (re)integration program for parolees and probationers. Suppose we are in 2013, and the county is facing major financial setbacks. One proposal is to abolish the community (re)integration program. Suppose further our class has been hired by the program administrators to make an evidence-based case for continued funding of this program.

2. Virginia Beach got a new mayor in 2005. This new major bragged about causing a major turnaround in the property crime rate. He said his “tough on theft” stance deterred would-be thieves, thereby reducing crime and victimization. Analyze the relevant data, and determine whether the data support the mayor’s boast.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

n this discussion, you’ll complete your first of three Walk In My Shoes assignments. These learning activities, which will end in your final presentation,

n this discussion, you’ll complete your first of three Walk In My Shoes assignments. These learning activities, which will end in your final presentation, explore corrections through the perspectives of individuals most impacted by these systems. We’ll begin by reading two articles from “Life Inside,” a weekly first-person series written by real

part A (2.3 Discussion: Police Organizations) Why This Discussion? Now that you’ve learned about police organizations, it’s time to apply what you’ve

part A (2.3 Discussion: Police Organizations) Why This Discussion? Now that you’ve learned about police organizations, it’s time to apply what you’ve learned while acting again as the chief of the Atlanta Police Department. Since police chiefs are expected to make evidence-based decisions as police leaders, consider what evidence from the

Description Deliverable Length: 2 pages (matrix may be enclosed in the paper) Complete the following:Using the technique of screening for suitability,

Description Deliverable Length: 2 pages (matrix may be enclosed in the paper) Complete the following: Using the technique of screening for suitability, feasibility, acceptability, distinguishability, completeness, and evaluation criteria, conduct a critical analysis to identify the most practical course of action (COA). Develop a comparison matrix slide that examines the COAs

Description Deliverable Length: 2 pages (matrix may be enclosed in the paper) Complete the following:Using the technique of screening for suitability,

Description Deliverable Length: 2 pages (matrix may be enclosed in the paper) Complete the following: Using the technique of screening for suitability, feasibility, acceptability, distinguishability, completeness, and evaluation criteria, conduct a critical analysis to identify the most practical course of action (COA). Develop a comparison matrix slide that examines the COAs

Discuss the difference between classical, neoclassical, and positivist criminology. Give an example of a crime and explain the crime using each

Discuss the difference between classical, neoclassical, and positivist criminology. Give an example of a crime and explain the crime using each theory. What are the differences between criminal and civil law? Provide examples or scenarios that highlight those differences. Justify your response with supporting material from at least one scholarly academic