HRM411 – Seminar in Human Resource Management Journal: Forced RankingDue Date: 11:59 pm EST, Sunday of Unit 5 Points: 100 Overview: Forced

HRM411 – Seminar in Human
Resource Management

Journal: Forced Ranking

Due Date: 11:59 pm EST, Sunday of Unit 5
Points: 100

Overview:

Forced ranking is a controversial management tool which measures, ranks and grades
employees’ work performance based on their comparison with each other instead of
against fixed standards. This assignment explores forced ranking.

Instructions:

• Define the term ‘forced ranking.’
• What are the advantages and disadvantages of using a ‘forced ranking’

performance management process?
• Forumulate an opinion and support it with properly cited source material and

data.

Requirements:

• Submit a Word document in APA format.
• Maximum three pages, minimum 500 words in length, excluding the Title and

Reference pages.
• At least two resources.

Be sure to read the criteria below by which your work will be evaluated before
you write and again after you write.

Evaluation Rubric for Journal: Forced Ranking Assignment

CRITERIA Deficient Needs
Improvement

Proficient Exemplary

0 – 38 points 39 – 51 points 52 – 64 points 65 points
Content Does not cover

the assigned
topic;
assertions are
not supported
by evidence;
paper is
seriously
lacking in
content and
detail.

Does not do an
adequate job of
covering the
assigned topic;
assertions are
weakly
supported by
evidence.

Sufficient
coverage of the
topics; most
assertions are
supported by
evidence.

Provides in-
depth coverage
of the topics,
assertions are
clearly
supported by
evidence.

0 – 5 points 6 – 7 points 8 – 9 points 10 points
Resources 0 resources or

resources that
were not
relevant

n/a 1 relevant
resource

2 relevant
resources

Paper Length Does not meet
the length
requirement.

n/a n/a Meets the
length
requirement.

0 – 8 points 9 – 11 points 12 – 14 points 15 points
Clear and
Professional
Writing and
APA Format

Errors impede
professional
presentation;
guidelines not
followed.

Significant
errors that do
not impede
professional
presentation.

Few errors that
do not impede
professional
presentation.

Writing and
format are
clear,
professional,
APA compliant,
and error free.

  • Overview:
  • Instructions:
  • Requirements:
  • Evaluation Rubric for Journal: Forced Ranking Assignment

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

PRINCIPLES OF MANAGEMENT POWERPOINT PRESENTATION PROJECT TOPICS

PRINCIPLES OF MANAGEMENT POWERPOINT PRESENTATION PROJECT TOPICS · Product Liability · General Motors · Philip Morris · Remington Rifle Models 700 & 710 · Talcum Powder Ovarian Cancer · Exploding Coca-Cola · Blitz Gas Cans · Most Innovative & Famous Leaders · Reed Hastings – Netflix · Evan Spiegel –

SEE ATTACHEDTCOB Graduate Studies Discussion RubricCriteria No Submission 0 pointsNovice (Criterion is missing or notin evidence) 1-13

SEE ATTACHED TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric Criteria No Submission 0 points Novice (Criterion is missing or not in evidence) 1-13 points Basic (works towards meeting expectations; performance needs improvement) 14-16 points Proficient (meets expectations; performance is satisfactory) 17-18 points Exemplary (exceeds expectations; performance is outstanding) 19-20 points Support of

Context Employee development programs can help organizations attract and retain top talent, increase employee engagement, and improve overall

Context Employee development programs can help organizations attract and retain top talent, increase employee engagement, and improve overall organizational performance. In this discussion thread, we will explore the importance of employee development from a human resource management perspective and some common types of employee development such as mentorship, coaching, and

see attachedTCOB Graduate Studies Discussion RubricCriteria No Submission 0 pointsNovice (Criterion is missing or notin evidence) 1-13

see attached TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric Criteria No Submission 0 points Novice (Criterion is missing or not in evidence) 1-13 points Basic (works towards meeting expectations; performance needs improvement) 14-16 points Proficient (meets expectations; performance is satisfactory) 17-18 points Exemplary (exceeds expectations; performance is outstanding) 19-20 points Support of

Case StudyCase StudyPurpose: Flexibility, adaptability, and responsiveness to the external

Case Study Case Study Purpose: Flexibility, adaptability, and responsiveness to the external environment is essential if organizations are going to survive and thrive in a rapidly changing environment. Therefore, leaders and managers must know how to  implement change successfully in their organizations or departments in response to rapidly shifting conditions. The