HRM411 – Seminar in Human Resource Management Journal: Forced RankingDue Date: 11:59 pm EST, Sunday of Unit 5 Points: 100 Overview: Forced

HRM411 – Seminar in Human
Resource Management

Journal: Forced Ranking

Due Date: 11:59 pm EST, Sunday of Unit 5
Points: 100

Overview:

Forced ranking is a controversial management tool which measures, ranks and grades
employees’ work performance based on their comparison with each other instead of
against fixed standards. This assignment explores forced ranking.

Instructions:

• Define the term ‘forced ranking.’
• What are the advantages and disadvantages of using a ‘forced ranking’

performance management process?
• Forumulate an opinion and support it with properly cited source material and

data.

Requirements:

• Submit a Word document in APA format.
• Maximum three pages, minimum 500 words in length, excluding the Title and

Reference pages.
• At least two resources.

Be sure to read the criteria below by which your work will be evaluated before
you write and again after you write.

Evaluation Rubric for Journal: Forced Ranking Assignment

CRITERIA Deficient Needs
Improvement

Proficient Exemplary

0 – 38 points 39 – 51 points 52 – 64 points 65 points
Content Does not cover

the assigned
topic;
assertions are
not supported
by evidence;
paper is
seriously
lacking in
content and
detail.

Does not do an
adequate job of
covering the
assigned topic;
assertions are
weakly
supported by
evidence.

Sufficient
coverage of the
topics; most
assertions are
supported by
evidence.

Provides in-
depth coverage
of the topics,
assertions are
clearly
supported by
evidence.

0 – 5 points 6 – 7 points 8 – 9 points 10 points
Resources 0 resources or

resources that
were not
relevant

n/a 1 relevant
resource

2 relevant
resources

Paper Length Does not meet
the length
requirement.

n/a n/a Meets the
length
requirement.

0 – 8 points 9 – 11 points 12 – 14 points 15 points
Clear and
Professional
Writing and
APA Format

Errors impede
professional
presentation;
guidelines not
followed.

Significant
errors that do
not impede
professional
presentation.

Few errors that
do not impede
professional
presentation.

Writing and
format are
clear,
professional,
APA compliant,
and error free.

  • Overview:
  • Instructions:
  • Requirements:
  • Evaluation Rubric for Journal: Forced Ranking Assignment

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Human Resources Management Annotated BibliographyPurpose: This assignment seeks to examine the impact of environmental change on management

Human Resources Management Annotated Bibliography Purpose: This assignment seeks to examine the impact of environmental change on management practices.  This project is created to encourage good research and writing skills that are needed for assignments, and to identify and evaluate theories and theorists that influence our management building skills. Your

SEE ATTACHEDTCOB Graduate Studies Discussion RubricCriteria No Submission 0 pointsNovice (Criterion is missing or notin evidence) 1-13

SEE ATTACHED TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric Criteria No Submission 0 points Novice (Criterion is missing or not in evidence) 1-13 points Basic (works towards meeting expectations; performance needs improvement) 14-16 points Proficient (meets expectations; performance is satisfactory) 17-18 points Exemplary (exceeds expectations; performance is outstanding) 19-20 points Support of

See AttachedTCOB Graduate Studies Discussion RubricCriteria No Submission 0 pointsNovice (Criterion is missing or notin evidence) 1-13

See Attached TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric Criteria No Submission 0 points Novice (Criterion is missing or not in evidence) 1-13 points Basic (works towards meeting expectations; performance needs improvement) 14-16 points Proficient (meets expectations; performance is satisfactory) 17-18 points Exemplary (exceeds expectations; performance is outstanding) 19-20 points Support of