Resources Module 3 Required Readings · Wilson, S. (2016).  Thinking differently about leadership: A critical

Resources Module 3

Required Readings

· Wilson, S. (2016). 
Thinking differently about leadership: A critical history of leadership studies. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.  Chapters 5 & 6

·
Alvesson & Kärreman

 (2000). Varieties of discourse: On the study of organizations through discourse analysis. 
 Human Relations
53, 1125-1149.

·
Alvesson & Spicer

 (2012). Critical leadership studies: The case for critical performativity.  
Human Relations
65, 367-390.

·
[NOTE: ALL GROUPS (RESPECTIVELY) WILL COLLABORATE TO ANNOTATE THIS READING. BEFORE BEGINNING THIS READING, PLEASE REVIEW THE ASSIGNMENT]

Recommended Readings

·
Cabantous et al. 

Reading.  Critical essay:  Reconsidering critical performativity.

·
Fleming & Banerjee

 Reading.  When performativity fails:  Implications for critical management studies.

·
Blommaert & Bulcaen

 Reading.  Critical discourse analysis.

Multimedia

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Human Resources Management Annotated BibliographyPurpose: This assignment seeks to examine the impact of environmental change on management

Human Resources Management Annotated Bibliography Purpose: This assignment seeks to examine the impact of environmental change on management practices.  This project is created to encourage good research and writing skills that are needed for assignments, and to identify and evaluate theories and theorists that influence our management building skills. Your

SEE ATTACHEDTCOB Graduate Studies Discussion RubricCriteria No Submission 0 pointsNovice (Criterion is missing or notin evidence) 1-13

SEE ATTACHED TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric Criteria No Submission 0 points Novice (Criterion is missing or not in evidence) 1-13 points Basic (works towards meeting expectations; performance needs improvement) 14-16 points Proficient (meets expectations; performance is satisfactory) 17-18 points Exemplary (exceeds expectations; performance is outstanding) 19-20 points Support of