At the end of Courts, Chapter Four (p. 229), there are two very good discussion questions. As these questions so beautifully complement each other,

At the end of Courts, Chapter Four (p. 229), there are two very good discussion questions. As these questions so beautifully complement each other, lets look at them both.

• How might the development of sentencing guidelines only serve to “structure” unfair sentencing practices? 

• Why do some judges believe that plea bargaining has become an “arena for hidden disparity” when sentencing guidelines are enforced?   

TEXT BOOK ;Forty Studies that Changed Criminal Justice: Explorations into the History of Criminal Justice Research 2nd Edition

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

P1 Q1 200 word response 1 reference/intext citation Due 1/17/2025 Elliot When agencies compete for control over the same investigation, mechanisms

P1 Q1 200 word response 1 reference/intext citation Due 1/17/2025 Elliot When agencies compete for control over the same investigation, mechanisms like the establishment of lead agencies, interagency protocols, or the appointment of special counsels are essential are critical. Ensuring investigative integrity requires clear communication. In addition, role delineation and

100 word response1 reference/intext citationDue 1/10/2025

100 word response 1 reference/intext citation Due 1/10/2025 Shroeder Post 2 Q2: The orientations of trying to prove a case and uncovering the truth aren’t necessarily different. If investigators coexist, between both, it takes balance. The main goal should be uncovering the truth. Uncovering the truth despite the tension is

100 word response1 reference/intext citationDue 1/10/2025Epps

100 word response 1 reference/intext citation Due 1/10/2025 Epps Post 2 Q2: Investigators often face tension between striving to prove a case and uncovering the truth. Are these orientations fundamentally different, or can they coexist within investigative work? Choose one orientation, explain your perspective, and use a real or hypothetical