Assignment # 1  – In this assignment, you will examine Response to Intervention (RTI) and Evidence-Based Practices (EBP) and examine at least 3

Assignment # 1  – In this assignment, you will examine Response to Intervention (RTI) and Evidence-Based Practices (EBP) and examine at least 3 Evidence-Based Practices that can be used in RTI settings.   RTI settings allow for a lot of room related to program delivery, so you should be able to examine how RTI and EBP are connected in real-life classrooms.  You should also examine the role of evidence-based practices and the criteria that you used to determine if these interventions were adequately vetted classroom practices. This paper is not to be lengthy – a maximum of 5 pages (not including references; an abstract is not needed). The assignment rubric will be used for this assignment, but feedback will be in comments about your submission. This paper should reflect the professional literature, not your opinion.

General Rubric For All Assignments

This rubric will be used in evaluating the quality of your discussion contributions and written assignments. Numeric values are not assigned to the categories as they change according to the value of the assignment. I want to see well thought out and referenced ideas, not opinion based on experience. Experience is a wonderful thing, but in this course we will stick to researched facts from your text and peer-reviewed articles.

 

    Criteria                                                                     Ratings

 

 

 

 

 

Grasp of readings

 

Excellent

Writing and oral expression represents researched perspective, evidence and conclusions accurately, fairly, and eloquently; Demonstrates a firm understanding of the implications of researched arguments.

Good

Writing and oral presentation represents the researched perspective, evidence, and conclusions accurately but with little detail.

Developing

Writing and oral presentation mostly represents the researched perspective, evidence, and conclusions though not clearly and/or there are minor inaccuracies. Some opinion.

Needs Improvement

Writing and/or poor oral presentation represents the researched perspective, evidence, and/or conclusions. Mostly opinion.

 

 

 

 

 

Critical analysis

Excellent

Presents a clear, focused, and compelling position. Recognizes and presents the complexity of the issue.

Good

Position/opinions articulated well but needs more support and refining.

Developing

Analysis and thought are limited. Lacks support from research. Some opinion.

Needs Improvement

Vague and general comments. Mostly opinion.

 

 

 

 

 

Evidence

Excellent

Evidence is cited, detailed, and well-chosen. Evidence is clearly articulated.

Good

Evidence is well chosen but not well articulated, is not particularly presented and not clearly substantiated.

Developing

Evidence is weak and lacking in detail.

Some opinion.

Needs Improvement

Evidence does not support ideas. Mostly opinion.

 

 

 

 

 

Organization & Clarity

Excellent

Thoughts flow logically with good transitions, including supported research.

Good

Thoughts are mostly well-structured and mostly presented clearly.

Developing

Jumps from one idea to another without structure, transitions or connections.

 

Needs Improvement

Thoughts are not presented logically. Mostly opinion.

 

 

 

 

 

Mechanics

Excellent

When applicable, thoughts/paper are appropriately organized using APA format throughout. There are no incomplete or run on sentences. No spelling or grammar issues.

Good

Thoughts/paper is appropriately organized with only minor grammatical issues.

Developing

There are many formatting, spelling, word usage and grammar issues.

Needs Improvement

Unacceptable. There are incomplete and/or run-on sentence(s). Thoughts are characterized by spelling and grammar errors.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

 Discussion Points:Information technology professionals face many ethical obligations, conflicts, and dilemmas. Discuss ethical issues an IT

 Discussion Points: Information technology professionals face many ethical obligations, conflicts, and dilemmas. Discuss ethical issues an IT professional might face. Consider the ethical implications associated with Mobile Computing, Social Media, and Cloud Computing! Privacy in the workplace: What are employees’ privacy rights in the workplace? Can employers monitor their employees’

 Back pain relief often involves a combination of self-care strategies and professional massage . Common methods include gentle stretching exercises

 Back pain relief often involves a combination of self-care strategies and professional massage . Common methods include gentle stretching exercises that target the lower back and core muscles, helping to improve flexibility Massage in dubai. Home massage dubai Applying heat or cold packs can also help alleviate pain by relaxing muscles and reducing

STUDY GUIDE FORUMAbnormal brain development or damage at an early age can lead to neurodevelopmental disorders. Within this group of disorders,

STUDY GUIDE FORUM Abnormal brain development or damage at an early age can lead to neurodevelopmental disorders. Within this group of disorders, some are resolvable with appropriate and timely interventions, either pharmacological or nonpharmacological, while other disorders are chronic and need to be managed throughout the lifespan. For this Assignment,

Assignment Differentiate between normal and abnormal physiologic changes in pregnancy. During your clinical practicum experiences, you may have

Assignment Differentiate between normal and abnormal physiologic changes in pregnancy. During your clinical practicum experiences, you may have encountered a pregnant patient with a specific pregnancy-related health condition. If not, select a maternal pregnancy-related condition that would impact risk. Answer the following questions: 1. Define and describe the health condition.

Behaviorally anchored rating scales (BARS) directly assess performance  behaviors. The BARS method depends on critical incidents or

Behaviorally anchored rating scales (BARS) directly assess performance  behaviors. The BARS method depends on critical incidents or short descriptions of effective and ineffective behaviors that ultimately produce a number value. The assessor is responsible for rating the specific behaviors of an employee based upon the behavioral expectations that are provided as