Review the supplemental video “A Meaning-Making Approach to Work With Trauma” listed in the Topic 3 Resources and summarize in one paragraph (4-6

Review the supplemental video “A Meaning-Making Approach to Work With Trauma” listed in the Topic 3 Resources and summarize in one paragraph (4-6 sentences) the meaning the client ascribes to their lived experiences as it pertains to the themes identified in the reading. Then write a script of the dialog between you and the client ensuring you note how you are attending to the clients’ emotions. Identify opportunities for empathic questioning about the client’s desire to live, contrasted with the client’s desire to die. Include a summary statement that you would use to ensure you are maintaining rapport, conveying empathy, and attending to the clients need for meaning and purpose. Include at least one scholarly source to support your response. Cite any scholarly references accordingly using in-text citations and a reference list.This discussion question is informed by the following CACREP Standards: 2.F.5.f. Counselor characteristics and behaviors that influence the counseling process. 2.F.5.g. Essential interviewing, counseling, and case conceptualization skills.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Assessment Description According to our text, spirituality plays a significant role in African American culture, yet, historically, the majority of

Assessment Description According to our text, spirituality plays a significant role in African American culture, yet, historically, the majority of counselors see themselves as “nonreligious.” How would you utilize the spirituality of an African American client as a resource in helping them manage their mental health issues? Use the GCU Statement

SUBJECT: PSYCHOLOGY AND LAW   INSTRUCTIONS: Expert testimony and scientific evidence in general are held to certain standards before they can be ruled as

SUBJECT: PSYCHOLOGY AND LAW   INSTRUCTIONS: Expert testimony and scientific evidence in general are held to certain standards before they can be ruled as admissible. In many jurisdictions, the standards are referred to as the Daubert standards. One procedure that has had a checkered history regarding admissibility in court is polygraph testing, done

SUBJECT: PSYCHOLOGY AND LAW  INSTRUCTIONS: Expert testimony and scientific evidence in general are held to certain standards before they can be ruled as

SUBJECT: PSYCHOLOGY AND LAW  INSTRUCTIONS: Expert testimony and scientific evidence in general are held to certain standards before they can be ruled as admissible. In many jurisdictions, the standards are referred to as the Daubert standards. One procedure that has had a checkered history regarding admissibility in court is polygraph testing, done